Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751514AbWHJUKa (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:10:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751510AbWHJUKK (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:10:10 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:50613 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751154AbWHJUKF (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:10:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/5] Register ext3dev filesystem From: Dave Kleikamp To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Theodore Tso , Erik Mouw , Mingming Cao , akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <44DB8EBE.6060003@garzik.org> References: <1155172642.3161.74.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060810092021.GB11361@harddisk-recovery.com> <20060810175920.GC19238@thunk.org> <44DB8EBE.6060003@garzik.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:08:43 -0500 Message-Id: <1155240524.12082.14.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1613 Lines: 35 On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 15:53 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Theodore Tso wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:20:22AM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 06:17:22PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > >>> Register ext4 filesystem as ext3dev filesystem in kernel. > >> Why confuse users with the name "ext3dev"? If a filesystem lives in > >> fs/blah/, it's registered as "blah" and can be mounted with "-t blah". > >> Just register the filesystem as "ext4" and mark it "EXPERIMENTAL" in > >> Kconfig. > > > > We had this discussion on LKML. There were those who were concerned > > that it would not be enough just to mark it be EXPERIMENTAL. > > I _want_ to agree with Erik, but I must agree: CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL is > pretty worthless in practice :( It's not maintained rigorously, and > distros _always_ enable it, because otherwise they would often omit key > drivers that people actively use. > > So, while my own personal preference would be to follow Erik's > suggestion... thinking realistically, an fstype change from "ext3dev" > to "ext4" is a far more obvious-to-users method of creating a > devel/production line of demarcation. IF it's decided to register the file system as ext3dev (Would ext4dev make more sense?), I would prefer the config options and code continues to simply use ext4. -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/