Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:35:35 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] x86/clear_page: add clear_page_uncached()
Message-ID: <20201015103535.GC11838@zn.tnic>
References: <20201014195823.GC18196@zn.tnic>
 <22E29783-F1F5-43DA-B35F-D75FB247475D@amacapital.net>
 <20201014211214.GD18196@zn.tnic>
 <3de58840-1f4c-566b-3a66-46d57475820c@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3de58840-1f4c-566b-3a66-46d57475820c@oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 08:37:44PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> I don't disagree but I think the selection of cached/uncached route should
> be made where we have enough context available to be able to choose to do
> this.
>
> This could be for example, done in mm_populate() or gup where if say the
> extent is larger than LLC-size, it takes the uncached path.

Are there examples where we don't know the size?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette