Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp342626pxu; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 05:32:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1yH828YQkut5EMYwlNnVKe6Y9CwFi1gfyuIA4xU1AVZ72YStMc4ig8r2FD87OAUAvWx2F X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3bc9:: with SMTP id v9mr4107848ejf.340.1602765136210; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 05:32:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602765136; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IZtso+aVYM+JLlY43/dK74lAwYUcIibA6LQXf+HmbNWaoxIYh+NUh2SRJZ474jDlhc sbfY3wEwQIFuI71Zdes2OeNOTNj4whSq6TrbTI6STUFLnoviAKLZqVIKzZOUU55nuP6Z COHab3d6O8p+4InhqP/wgjA/4ewn49PS1OTHBq8epWVf/yB6pINev+yenZnY9N37v61w jNf3oETlsSXuFQg6cAK6lpHZw+iAhfFf+J7hl+cHeeZQUxrWfD5OxYZbh3o3heGqaThi j79jcktJUn09VLZhcF/Use6STTI1haAw3jrqhsg+W4Q56Xhdb3qvJPlq0RZn9P699Cgz BBZw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=hohnduzmz67Xw0rWbedycdWPgNxQNS3D2jQm/OyvVkw=; b=ltiZ57W0cq+cEP1TfB0YA3Fcyj3BFPugyQV5yisDjGX1iW9QTYKHeDR9+4jxkl+koX Bu3v+uqDXZbUWNvZzIg2UnDwfaMB/9VNMMdJ4ad49uM25t7CNKHEAMBEJLidJxES0CF+ zLqVyZQUXxO9RAr3IYVI+dl+loC+B9wOI8OpWZyCAdYqjRTIvwFBpOP7D03UBFi7fecn r6Ddbsnl3l3UkL2RwteUMlnGqH/pWFWrdcsYrMM+16b1a32vf/+ENL2LgwrKFuTvZIE2 T8SWqLBXprPXGslDsTTHEp7yFaXbJRngHQYVSmKy3l8HZGs2YtBCTR0MgGqS0+y+ZMds WxrQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b18si1986579ejz.84.2020.10.15.05.31.47; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 05:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387558AbgJOMAH (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 08:00:07 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:35350 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730003AbgJOL4N (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 07:56:13 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2AA31B; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 04:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.2] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BD653F66B; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 04:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] sched/uclamp: add SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_RESET flag to reset uclamp To: Yun Hsiang Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qais.yousef@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net References: <20201012163140.371688-1-hsiang023167@gmail.com> <20201014150034.GA502296@ubuntu> From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:56:09 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201014150034.GA502296@ubuntu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/10/2020 17:00, Yun Hsiang wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:25:48PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >> Hi Yun, >> >> On 12/10/2020 18:31, Yun Hsiang wrote: [...] > The tg uclamp value may also change. If top-app's cpu.uclamp.min change > to 50 (~500), then task A's effective uclamp min value is 300 not ~500. > We can set task A's uclamp to 1024, it will be restricted by the tg. > But when task A move to root group, it's effective uclamp min value > will be 1024 not 0. If a task is in root group and it doesn't want to > control it's uclamp, the effective uclamp min value of that task should be 0. > So I think reset functionality is needed. OK, looks like the intended solution { a) or b) in https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87zh4ohnf9.derkling@matbug.net} is not really feasible. So we do need the uclamp reset to enable throughout the entire lifetime of task p 'p is !user_defined -> p is controlled by taskgroup hierarchy)'.