Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:31:20 +0200
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 5.10
Message-ID: <20201015143120.GO6756@twin.jikos.cz>
Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz
Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <cover.1602519695.git.dsterba@suse.com>
 <20201015114011.1f5f985a@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201015114011.1f5f985a@canb.auug.org.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12)
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:40:11AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:25:02 +0200 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> wrote:
> >
> > Mishaps:
> > 
> > - commit 62cf5391209a ("btrfs: move btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev
> >   outside of all locks") is a rebase leftover after the patch got
> >   merged to 5.9-rc8 as a466c85edc6f ("btrfs: move
> >   btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev outside of all locks"), the
> >   remaining part is trivial and the patch is in the middle of the
> >   series so I'm keeping it there instead of rebasing
> 
> And yet, this entire pull request has been rebased since what was in
> linux-next on Tuesday (and what would still be there today except I
> dropped it because of several conflicts) ...  it looks like it was
> rebased a week ago, but then never included in your "for-next" branch.
> So I supposed it has had your internal testing, at least.

I was on vacation last week and rebased the to-be-pulled branch on top
of v5.9-rc8 so there are at least a few days before the pull request is
sent.

The patch queue was feature frozen for 2 weeks, there should be no
surprises whether it's rc7 or rc8, but the latter contained a corruption
fix so it was desirable to rebase the development queue. Due to my
limited time I forgot to update the for-next branches, sorry. We do
enough internal testing of course.