Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201014175342.152712-1-jandryuk@gmail.com> <20201014175342.152712-3-jandryuk@gmail.com>
 <6cd9363c-ac0c-ea68-c8e7-9fd3cd30a89b@oracle.com> <4e31301b-0e57-ac89-cd71-6ad5e1a66628@citrix.com>
 <b097aec1-e549-a89a-ce43-e9c0a71179f2@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <b097aec1-e549-a89a-ce43-e9c0a71179f2@oracle.com>
From:   Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:50:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKf6xpuRZKF56yyOR-Q6oBSJUpRSr0P+XVJD7DvaS6GWnNcMTg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen: Kconfig: nest Xen guest options
To:     Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 9:17 AM <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/15/20 9:10 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 15/10/2020 13:37, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com wrote:
> >> On 10/14/20 1:53 PM, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> >>> +config XEN_512GB
> >>> +   bool "Limit Xen pv-domain memory to 512GB"
> >>> +   depends on XEN_PV && X86_64
> >> Why is X86_64 needed here?
> >> 512G support was implemented using a direct-mapped P2M, and is rather
> > beyond the virtual address capabilities of 32bit.
> >
>
> Yes, my point was that XEN_PV already depends on X86_64.

Oh, thanks for catching this.  I re-introduced it by accident when
rebasing the patches.

Regards,
Jason