Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751528AbWHJUXf (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:23:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751534AbWHJUXe (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:23:34 -0400 Received: from dtp.xs4all.nl ([80.126.206.180]:59504 "HELO abra2.bitwizard.nl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751528AbWHJUXK (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:23:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:23:08 +0200 From: Erik Mouw To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Theodore Tso , Mingming Cao , akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/5] Register ext3dev filesystem Message-ID: <20060810202307.GB12766@harddisk-recovery.com> References: <1155172642.3161.74.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060810092021.GB11361@harddisk-recovery.com> <20060810175920.GC19238@thunk.org> <44DB8EBE.6060003@garzik.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44DB8EBE.6060003@garzik.org> Organization: Harddisk-recovery.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1638 Lines: 37 On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:53:34PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Theodore Tso wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:20:22AM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 06:17:22PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > >>> Register ext4 filesystem as ext3dev filesystem in kernel. > >> Why confuse users with the name "ext3dev"? If a filesystem lives in > >> fs/blah/, it's registered as "blah" and can be mounted with "-t blah". > >> Just register the filesystem as "ext4" and mark it "EXPERIMENTAL" in > >> Kconfig. > > > > We had this discussion on LKML. There were those who were concerned > > that it would not be enough just to mark it be EXPERIMENTAL. > > I _want_ to agree with Erik, but I must agree: CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL is > pretty worthless in practice :( It's not maintained rigorously, and > distros _always_ enable it, because otherwise they would often omit key > drivers that people actively use. > > So, while my own personal preference would be to follow Erik's > suggestion... thinking realistically, an fstype change from "ext3dev" > to "ext4" is a far more obvious-to-users method of creating a > devel/production line of demarcation. So what about "ext4dev"? That shows that the filesystem is not ext3 and experimental. Erik -- +-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 -- | Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/