Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:37:32 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To:     Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>
Cc:     josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
        joel@joelfernandes.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU: fix a typo in comments of rcu_blocking_is_gp
Message-ID: <20201015173732.GY3249@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org
References: <1602733983-9803-1-git-send-email-zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1602733983-9803-1-git-send-email-zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 03:53:03AM +0000, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> There is a tiny typo in comment of function rcu_blocking_is_gp.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>

Good catch, queued, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index f78ee75..4cca03f 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -3512,7 +3512,7 @@ void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void)
>   * During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically
>   * implies a grace period.  Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPTION.
>   *
> - * Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any
> + * However, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any
>   * blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if
>   * there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of
>   * either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited().  It is OK to
> -- 
> 1.7.1
>