Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp1037823pxu; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 02:07:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwaO8SN4iIrunTvXnYqE+gPuJhVmZxAu+9XDTaYT8rmlBvE7S7p3nQEkxj5+7u8MbSoZqFi X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:388:: with SMTP id b8mr2550029eja.62.1602839245133; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 02:07:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602839245; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oWqIiXiVwo/3LJs4ccoBxQFu5zrQg2b/Us/P943pRGjt/LguNdR38QWs9WYwTIG0Xe ffePv0qhxBktlMt6BNuY54Jt6B/4ujVDTdUrwrhCmdW3fgxJo1EtDvl17DasILcre2nq eGZDNTn2klXmLM4grhYA6yzMqlHVxAVIcnKdLV9/I9rhSTtujrFa6/ekp3GKoV8gMgTp T+PTJ6zIRAYQuecuB/Il1D9w55Wt4zze9XVhO15jtVwKbcSWsIrZD1FXQmtKjlry5F2Q FiLUiyHWjOs6XflA9rReYQFbwtNMcFLmLpZUgvEqjSE2/tNWSIaKTMNLdryATiOxfMTf u1Qg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=uY4Ob93JBkADa0sWT/GE6L157d3kEuAliyEwdwR77es=; b=t8BAlAjjTWR0MhtHqNz7X+f9uaXrFQrjH0IiyAYphfuDHhJDd9hNe1cjrP2m0gd85r GXI+SZ6owcbATbnTSaXMmH0NUFF+cJdTifG5TaEyVxdcMZClR0EQvZyri0FT7Ktxhf6y BGC5PkDfswRrpiLhjfldGO6Z5zk4dh+XbDDM0OgJ12Oi4n7FxcP7ogf74sq8cZH1fpVX GRJQ/1F0GNDPYf9zFQKBVQgOkUrIi96kudHi7tDLQRbNBvJ2lrU/k+NinhR1aO4xey1v WLEuX1yjQd+C71buixni9VFrrWtfyZQMFbShxwNxvUJ+DVjdyNr7/OihFbD97Bqr3n3Z NVVw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q2si724834ejj.234.2020.10.16.02.07.02; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 02:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404906AbgJPHyp (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Oct 2020 03:54:45 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:57869 "EHLO relay3-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2404864AbgJPHyp (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2020 03:54:45 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 93.34.118.233 Received: from uno.localdomain (93-34-118-233.ip49.fastwebnet.it [93.34.118.233]) (Authenticated sender: jacopo@jmondi.org) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3E9760003; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:54:25 +0200 From: Jacopo Mondi To: Kieran Bingham Cc: Jacopo Mondi , laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com, niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hyun Kwon , Manivannan Sadhasivam Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] media: i2c: max9286: Configure reverse channel amplitude Message-ID: <20201016095425.ywmxsv5gjhoky7e2@uno.localdomain> References: <20201015182710.54795-1-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org> <20201015182710.54795-6-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Kieran, On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 08:52:01PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > On 15/10/2020 19:27, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > Adjust reverse channel amplitude according to the presence of > > the 'high-threshold" DTS property. > > > > If no high threshold compensation is required, start with a low > > amplitude (100mV) and increase it after the remote serializers > > have probed and have enabled noise immunity on their reverse > > channels. > > > > If high threshold compensation is required, configure the reverse > > channel with a 170mV amplitude before the remote serializers have > > probed. > > > > This change is required for both rdacm20 and rdacm21 camera modules > > to be correctly probed when used in combination with the max9286 > > deserializer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi > > --- > > drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c > > index 163e102199e3..4b59a9e0228a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c > > @@ -163,6 +163,8 @@ struct max9286_priv { > > unsigned int mux_channel; > > bool mux_open; > > > > + bool high_threshold; > > + > > struct v4l2_ctrl_handler ctrls; > > struct v4l2_ctrl *pixelrate; > > > > @@ -436,6 +438,32 @@ static int max9286_check_config_link(struct max9286_priv *priv, > > return 0; > > } > > > > +static void max9286_reverse_channel_setup(struct max9286_priv *priv, > > + unsigned int chan_amplitude) > > This looks like you're adding a new function - how about we add this > function here, in the first place when you add it in 3/7 > I'll move it up in 3/7 > > +{ > > + /* Reverse channel transmission time: default to 1. */ > > + u8 chan_config = MAX9286_REV_TRF(1); > > + > > + /* > > + * Reverse channel setup. > > + * > > + * - Enable custom reverse channel configuration (through register 0x3f) > > + * and set the first pulse length to 35 clock cycles. > > + * - Adjust reverse channel amplitude: values > 130 are programmed > > + * using the additional +100mV REV_AMP_X boost flag > > + */ > > + max9286_write(priv, 0x3f, MAX9286_EN_REV_CFG | MAX9286_REV_FLEN(35)); > > + > > + if (chan_amplitude > 100) { > > + /* It is not possible express values (100 < x < 130) */ > > + chan_amplitude = chan_amplitude < 130 > > + ? 30 : chan_amplitude - 100; > > + chan_config |= MAX9286_REV_AMP_X; > > + } > > + max9286_write(priv, 0x3b, chan_config | MAX9286_REV_AMP(chan_amplitude)); > > + usleep_range(2000, 2500); > > +} > > + > > /* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > * V4L2 Subdev > > */ > > @@ -531,10 +559,14 @@ static int max9286_notify_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier, > > * All enabled sources have probed and enabled their reverse control > > * channels: > > * > > + * - Increase the reverse channel amplitude to compensate for the > > + * remote ends high threshold, if not done already > > * - Verify all configuration links are properly detected > > * - Disable auto-ack as communication on the control channel are now > > * stable. > > */ > > + if (!priv->high_threshold) > > + max9286_reverse_channel_setup(priv, 170); > > is it troublesome to re-set it if it's already set? I guess it's just > unnecessary. so that's fine. > > > max9286_check_config_link(priv, priv->source_mask); > > > > /* > > @@ -906,32 +938,6 @@ static void max9286_v4l2_unregister(struct max9286_priv *priv) > > * Probe/Remove > > */ > > > > -static void max9286_reverse_channel_setup(struct max9286_priv *priv, > > - unsigned int chan_amplitude) > > -{ > > - /* Reverse channel transmission time: default to 1. */ > > - u8 chan_config = MAX9286_REV_TRF(1); > > - > > - /* > > - * Reverse channel setup. > > - * > > - * - Enable custom reverse channel configuration (through register 0x3f) > > - * and set the first pulse length to 35 clock cycles. > > - * - Adjust reverse channel amplitude: values > 130 are programmed > > - * using the additional +100mV REV_AMP_X boost flag > > - */ > > - max9286_write(priv, 0x3f, MAX9286_EN_REV_CFG | MAX9286_REV_FLEN(35)); > > - > > - if (chan_amplitude > 100) { > > - /* It is not possible express values (100 < x < 130) */ > > - chan_amplitude = chan_amplitude < 130 > > - ? 30 : chan_amplitude - 100; > > - chan_config |= MAX9286_REV_AMP_X; > > - } > > - max9286_write(priv, 0x3b, chan_config | MAX9286_REV_AMP(chan_amplitude)); > > - usleep_range(2000, 2500); > > -} > > - > > static int max9286_setup(struct max9286_priv *priv) > > { > > /* > > @@ -967,7 +973,15 @@ static int max9286_setup(struct max9286_priv *priv) > > * only. This should be disabled after the mux is initialised. > > */ > > max9286_configure_i2c(priv, true); > > - max9286_reverse_channel_setup(priv, 170); > > + > > + /* > > + * Compensate the remote end high threshold with a larger channel > > + * amplitude if necessary. > > + */ > > + if (priv->high_threshold) > > + max9286_reverse_channel_setup(priv, 170); > > + else > > + max9286_reverse_channel_setup(priv, 100); > > Hrm... ternery is more concise here, but is it helpful? > Ternary is nicer, you're right! > max9286_reverse_channel_setup(priv, priv->high_threshold ? 170 : 100); > > The high-threshold could also be parsed in > max9286_reverse_channel_setup(), but I like it being passed in. > > > > > /* > > * Enable GMSL links, mask unused ones and autodetect link > > @@ -1235,6 +1249,12 @@ static int max9286_parse_dt(struct max9286_priv *priv) > > } > > of_node_put(node); > > > > + /* > > + * Parse 'high_threshold' property to configure the reverse channel > > + * amplitude. > > + */ > > + priv->high_threshold = device_property_present(dev, "high_threshold"); > > + > > Oh, I think I like this, it's a neat way to express what it needs to do > from the DT depending on the attached cameras. > > It's sort of dependant upon the cameras though, I guess making this > something that we query from the remote endpoint isn't so easy ...? That's the real question. Is it fair to express as a deserializer property a setting of the remote serializer(s) ? What if the remotes have different configurations (we had to play with pre-programmed and non-pre-programmed RDACM20s in the past iirc). I've detailed a few possible way forward and their pros and cons in the v1 cover letter [1] and I'm happy to discuss them as I'm not sure this is the best possible way forward. Thanks j [1] For reference: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-renesas-soc/msg52886.html > > > > > priv->route_mask = priv->source_mask; > > > > return 0; > > >