Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:20:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:20:20 -0500 Received: from sal.qcc.sk.ca ([198.169.27.3]:7183 "HELO sal.qcc.sk.ca") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:20:11 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:20:44 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch] Re: Nasty suprise with uptime Message-ID: <20011031142044.D6869@qcc.sk.ca> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from root@chaos.analogic.com on Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 02:52:04PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > That's 6 extra clocks every Hz or 600 clocks per second. By the time > you've reached the 497.1 days, you have wasted.... 0xffffffff/6 = > 715,827,882 CPU clocks just so 'uptime' is correct? I don't think > so. I'd reboot. For proportion: 716 million CPU clocks, on an "average" PC today is less than one second of CPU time. Over the course of 497 days, that's not much overhead at all. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/