Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:53:08 +0000
To:     Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
From:   =?utf-8?Q?Barnab=C3=A1s_P=C5=91cze?= <pobrn@protonmail.com>
Cc:     "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
        Helmut Stult <helmut.stult@schinfo.de>,
        "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Reply-To: =?utf-8?Q?Barnab=C3=A1s_P=C5=91cze?= <pobrn@protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: i2c-hid: add polling mode based on connected GPIO chip's pin status
Message-ID: <eA5pt2nxH5jB_qgxYEAHbUxK5Rxww6DE2IpvFKGrvMyZvM2nZbqil2egzmycszz06jij2B69JG-dqNQ5XLuufMzUm10bxLJ2xHoj9UEY5jk=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201019005412.rifxrvpdxu574jag@Rk>
References: <20201016131335.8121-1-coiby.xu@gmail.com> <T2SIcFVxZ81NUwKLDbSESA7Wpm7DYowEiii8ZaxTPtrdXZZeHLq5iZPkN5BLlp-9C6PLwUZOVwNpMdEdPSRZcAG4MmDt-tfyKZoQYJ0KHOA=@protonmail.com> <20201017004556.kuoxzmbvef4yr3kg@Rk> <FWsXxqGztJgszUpmNtKli8eOyeKP-lxFeTsjs2nQAxgYZBkT3JNTU3VdHF4GbQVS_PvKiqbfrZXI7vaUHA_lXTxjPX-WjkNEOdiMUetO8IQ=@protonmail.com> <20201017140541.fggujaz2klpv3cd5@Rk> <fRxQJHWq9ZL950ZPGFFm_LfSlMjsjrpG7Y63gd7V7iV647KR8WIfZ4-ljLeo0n4X3Gpu1KIEsMVLxQnzAtJdUdMydi_b0-vjIVb304Da1bQ=@protonmail.com> <20201019005412.rifxrvpdxu574jag@Rk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

> [...]
> You have been directly contributing to this patch because several
> improvements of next version are from you. I experienced a similar
> situation when submitting patches for QEMU. The only difference is
> that the feedbacks on the QEMU patches were also given in the format
> of patch. Or do you think a reviewed-by tag from you after you think
> the next version is of production quality is a better way to credit
> you?

Thanks, but there is no need for any tag from me. I am no maintainer/review=
er of/for
the affected subsystem.

> [...]


Regards,
Barnab=C3=A1s P=C5=91cze