Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp3287927pxu; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:31:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxc1JBH03S/ol0Dzf0ftGrs4F2ryCiE10qplyPlhUNsEzGtZwKRZCrVA0od6a6Yh0sEBt3s X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5e4f:: with SMTP id b15mr410361eju.353.1603121473500; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:31:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603121473; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jyoQYZBrROc8+mJvGlAVwAPA/YKDBeymr6ykWRGN8u5FqUEMgfqH3Bp6sU5AJJ2MRY fwOXevqWMf+OA8rBhfrZyRDAfJJDeINtTUfzfjkHFi/bH+Fiq4vKWp2DhRONN+oTbLYp dzWZv3OEaTc7GvfWNT3s7x7QpY2rJXfY1Ao4q/rJ5/OssGCbLkjZt56kIpMJNoTowPBC EjL9cDHrNWcKLw3PzU7eDoF+SA6UHwygOkzI+zLQ+1WTeojQxVe3soawik8Z2Qfya8XK AcWztMiYhz1/7r7taU1A9lpvWyv6p68F7U+JJ+TyziFWdSVGB+qIEJSO9wf5Fvys7Bwv 6P0g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature :dkim-signature:date; bh=SSA1rgI9oUHNMXQCJ0EHFIg5+7llZCrIXvKF9z6SCbw=; b=NmXlgy6EsEXZScYNnC6pTlAbFy5jTJ2uAHSisdgrNEaPK5neVKliqlLopTJRfNwR0f LvvLSDB0XgWxghYOsWin1I6RkcmesKRwgYpY7QibHSJOCuw/0Uipm8RHGOMrEr6yEWUB T6GtGpB4d2WpBcVO/HS2t89arjMVv1gp0pj5rQ/D7b22OT378IRwWi+W5ugncawV+WQ4 DC0nwceY64w/Hw3LCEt9Ybc2otK5TttjpnSq76bHrj3jITP+xNtI7BlNrc9GgzWxq8pl T0IMkgFCbsE7oqC8nu/FYl7mZrMyUF1Rdt9sxICuumRPz4c1lK9vYP2Ct6Eh0+VdpXm/ ZeEA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b="yvag/1Wy"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o10si206242eja.154.2020.10.19.08.30.49; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b="yvag/1Wy"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730055AbgJSP3N (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:29:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51002 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729910AbgJSP3N (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:29:13 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44C3BC0613CE; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:29:09 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1603121351; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SSA1rgI9oUHNMXQCJ0EHFIg5+7llZCrIXvKF9z6SCbw=; b=yvag/1WyE7YGO01tuOZMVDXYJVVbRSZUTTDcNEFrW2Szp/K6KmRMXSdrwwJh0jiFmcGJLY 8KE6KOMD91iSqyY/CyDUCrqp/hAKY1ILkKnYqLfuhW8O5IW0a9jGHHDikT1fNnfmJ/Fgav 3C5W0+duxLTiCXtadB7bTetmmPu6616zmO3m0aie/2Hnh9nX8DmrYUIS/byQ9/x1a4ysRF oviWNZFtVpiXa0WdOMA1dSkH1t4fzBXGOsEbei86vRflWSjW7Pym78fr/8t/x/6jwgyXCu 4Kpxjs0IEaN7cXS0MkaOiv08H5Qi3dAv7EW75YhcfDSCCrTfSiPb8yccXJa4KQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1603121351; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SSA1rgI9oUHNMXQCJ0EHFIg5+7llZCrIXvKF9z6SCbw=; b=IQqz/onU2+jf4eNXTVcyVbj2HSt8tXuWdeTBN+hX+PstwLXy8ahJIUMMkGX0/vlc3putCI MM5QglGrGXuSwfDw== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Minchan Kim , Mikhail Gavrilov , Linux List Kernel Mailing , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith , ngupta@vflare.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: Fix __zram_bvec_{read,write}() locking order Message-ID: <20201019152909.rlnhqokqhhauq2kw@linutronix.de> References: <20201016124009.GQ2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20201016153324.GA1976566@google.com> <20201019101353.GJ2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201019101353.GJ2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020-10-19 12:13:53 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Mikhail reported a lockdep spat detailing how __zram_bvec_read() and > __zram_bvec_write() use zstrm->lock and zspage->lock in opposite order. > > Reported-by: Mikhail Gavrilov > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov We have the same patch in RT. I didn't submit it with the other local-lock patches because this splat pops up once pin_tag() is made a sleeping lock. I missed the part where migrate_read_lock() can be a lock. So: Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Sebastian