Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:48:26 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To:     Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, o.rempel@pengutronix.de,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org,
        s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com,
        linux-imx@nxp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX specific parse fw
 hook
Message-ID: <20201019174826.GC496175@xps15>
References: <20200927064131.24101-1-peng.fan@nxp.com>
 <20200927064131.24101-6-peng.fan@nxp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200927064131.24101-6-peng.fan@nxp.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 02:41:29PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> The hook is used to parse memory-regions and load resource table
> from the address the remote processor published.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 97 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 48ce09e857ee..bd3a42892b22 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> @@ -243,10 +244,106 @@ static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len)
>  	return va;
>  }
>  
> +static int imx_rproc_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc,
> +			       struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> +	void *va;
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "map memory: %p+%zx\n", &mem->dma, mem->len);
> +	va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %p+%zx\n",
> +			&mem->dma, mem->len);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Update memory entry va */
> +	mem->va = va;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc,
> +				 struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> +	dev_dbg(rproc->dev.parent, "unmap memory: %pa\n", &mem->dma);
> +	iounmap(mem->va);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_rproc_parse_memory_regions(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> +	struct device_node *np = priv->dev->of_node;
> +	struct of_phandle_iterator it;
> +	struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
> +	struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> +	int index = 0;
> +	u32 da;
> +
> +	/* Register associated reserved memory regions */
> +	of_phandle_iterator_init(&it, np, "memory-region", NULL, 0);
> +	while (of_phandle_iterator_next(&it) == 0) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Ignore the first memory region which will be used vdev buffer.
> +		 * No need to do extra handlings, rproc_add_virtio_dev will handle it.
> +		 */
> +		if (!index && !strcmp(it.node->name, "vdevbuffer")) {
> +			index ++;

How many vdevs is there in your scenario?  Since most of this code is taken from
stm32 anyway I would suggest to use "vdev0buffer" and get rid of the "index ++".  It
adds needless complexity and doesn't pass the checkpatch test.

With the above:
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it.node);
> +		if (!rmem) {
> +			dev_err(priv->dev, "unable to acquire memory-region\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* No need to translate pa to da, i.MX use same map */
> +		da = rmem->base;
> +
> +		/* Register memory region */
> +		mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(priv->dev, NULL, (dma_addr_t)rmem->base, rmem->size, da,
> +					   imx_rproc_mem_alloc, imx_rproc_mem_release,
> +					   it.node->name);
> +
> +		if (mem)
> +			rproc_coredump_add_segment(rproc, da, rmem->size);
> +		else
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +		rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
> +		index++;
> +	}
> +
> +	return  0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> +	int ret = imx_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_info(&rproc->dev, "No resource table in elf\n");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
>  	.start		= imx_rproc_start,
>  	.stop		= imx_rproc_stop,
>  	.da_to_va       = imx_rproc_da_to_va,
> +	.load		= rproc_elf_load_segments,
> +	.parse_fw	= imx_rproc_parse_fw,
> +	.find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> +	.sanity_check	= rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> +	.get_boot_addr	= rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
>  };
>  
>  static int imx_rproc_addr_init(struct imx_rproc *priv,
> -- 
> 2.28.0
>