Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp3678669pxu; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 19:33:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3rsI4aNC09mJbpjYntAxYtck1DKkysxbIxZPJDx4MpSo/SD9NH9D07VumypMJwdHmVWme X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c111:: with SMTP id do17mr858947ejc.452.1603161234799; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 19:33:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603161234; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ozrIw1n8fyRK0SslEANKoyO2Y5n0++0S6P1y7D56ZGjDpECh27JmRpk0O4ZieyJgPi jfmbwyNP0t5VrrPVL+uyAPDKMUv9/HcSDpnbP8N3H+/h6Gwps5GW7AcoT39ZG7r18S9h BSDFkYGYcBqwkw7oFRZp96rFt7V14BSkW5qe6V/+D7ogf5viwbIYwRFhjgg3LqqxaATY LVNKBj+VWe26XcValdBKvmo2UsfT8BXzKEL4p0qGxWi2xw0COjgZXNQemFsJOZ7TFVFp jFN5wguMwONFTzSxTsy42uvIniMerLX9NPKd4z+cYEgCorgGGVN08IbFGB48PNBgvrRK AT6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:subject:from :references:cc:to:dkim-signature; bh=444fod4pS8wnwCeyAaaHBWf5AIrCVyPy1iAPkz44TYA=; b=fqNTtNDjITpFESPul+XyCffSZ6vra1oDPRptdhNvj9bh83R6nRGaioJE7/jI5AEzz4 roXk0b6M7zO/NnO58UwL5blBvg4wejYFvZyQAwJJ9NRumG7eH+3V4TAEwsRJ/ufuDjjb r3/1sZHtULvYzYn7uEkiDtVvDV79rb7q5f5YoIOA1LbQ280HFDQlqMn6M0x2WaIxvDhR Ub0seILOPaQFWgVqmaGvMfrE4v1OaxqCSHycXvEQmN5fVbmx5M/Pvmi4o35Pj5nGzTOS RViLMdPrSUdUlpmFOEIHb85Yrzj8o2TkaUvKP475f55MZgStdMWKGsRtVgXp6adhJM0k EnzA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tessares-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=KrMGx96x; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z23si239084edx.29.2020.10.19.19.33.33; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 19:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tessares-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=KrMGx96x; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730495AbgJSQ17 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:27:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60492 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729879AbgJSQ16 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:27:58 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x644.google.com (mail-ej1-x644.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::644]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 853B7C0613D0 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x644.google.com with SMTP id dt13so14730732ejb.12 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:27:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tessares-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:cc:references:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=444fod4pS8wnwCeyAaaHBWf5AIrCVyPy1iAPkz44TYA=; b=KrMGx96x8S9Yhxs//KdD1LfYnksuqGPbDu9FwuEjwDGSuAOganTiz5gxrzu4058i1C FQzKsjF/6GFUOuTsIOs5h2Ibrki/ae/ks0KdAvEyv3slTjKEkcby9wJei8eQwttzY1qr zzqC9Nr43esAejllMH5tBZlCQWXy4g56GXu9OMz0gXjkskpNfd38JyWee3cVaUP5xXnK sAVmcVBCK2fQXyg2TSjMZCxTctJUXRFnJ3QW/uXUn5R4p92SjBOX/iA+FK4oWQ6OhtKj idjzqDEHT+2mZbzj37HXeQdVHIrntv0LHHXkt9Oec4UXiBi8m4mclUJzLsleum6CfRkB n6nA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:references:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=444fod4pS8wnwCeyAaaHBWf5AIrCVyPy1iAPkz44TYA=; b=Zs8bP6R1iGuqHSXzZ4faxeejZadq5zqhV/VAbWsAaMKMrvybtlus96R/A218QUKTcv AARcvxY8h4g2p+XwguVG/hMpgyNLGKRWD0PMdc0WrVfVPoP2q4I8db9BlrFO4gAXEwRZ du6KTiATgMNn305dPWywhbC735qJ+/QUznz2XZhmjHXk6vm40e98b0HiUdzEQoq96vrv pGtl5RwrbQDGoTXvtl3W+4LgORbrMtNtdhqNVm/MjlFhh8E2kBWpXEyg33Gvlj0iWAsP eljFdt5d/DeD3kMWGp97hICztEEXc6S9kL/fEVMBr5F6emmuGY+OvTYv8n4iOjpvh/xm 2VGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530NonAwpdUNMM0VqpUNkSS11sM9YRc6wloiCNPQF4lQ/4/GixGw 54knUI4WY0NbF48my9OCc9nbH47evZ4lkK5n X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:95c5:: with SMTP id n5mr680433ejy.111.1603124876855; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:27:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tsr-lap-08.nix.tessares.net ([2a02:578:85b0:e00:b49:2ba2:dca5:18d2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p3sm212556edy.38.2020.10.19.09.27.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:27:56 -0700 (PDT) To: Geliang Tang , Mat Martineau , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Peter Krystad Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: From: Matthieu Baerts Subject: Re: [MPTCP][PATCH net-next 0/2] init ahmac and port of mptcp_options_received Message-ID: <7766357d-0838-1603-9967-8910aa312f65@tessares.net> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:27:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Geliang, On 19/10/2020 12:23, Geliang Tang wrote: > This patchset deals with initializations of mptcp_options_received's two > fields, ahmac and port. > > Geliang Tang (2): > mptcp: initialize mptcp_options_received's ahmac > mptcp: move mptcp_options_received's port initialization Thank you for these two patches. They look good to me except one detail: these two patches are for -net and not net-next. I don't know if it is alright for Jakub to apply them to -net or if it is clearer to re-send them with an updated subject. If it is OK to apply them to -net without a re-submit, here is my: Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts Also, if you don't mind and while I am here, I never know: is it OK for you the maintainers to send one Acked/Reviewed-by for a whole series -- but then this is not reflected on patchwork -- or should we send one tag for each patch? Cheers, Matt -- Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions www.tessares.net