Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:15:25 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc:     Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>,
        Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
        vivien.didelot@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, olteanv@gmail.com,
        davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Don't force link when using
 in-band-status
Message-ID: <20201020141525.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <20201020034558.19438-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
 <20201020034558.19438-2-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
 <20201020101552.GB1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <20201020154940.60357b6c@nic.cz>
 <20201020140535.GE139700@lunn.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201020140535.GE139700@lunn.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 04:05:35PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 03:49:40PM +0200, Marek Behun wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:15:52 +0100
> > Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 04:45:56PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> > > > When a port is configured with 'managed = "in-band-status"' don't force
> > > > the link up, the switch MAC will detect the link status correctly.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>  
> > > 
> > > I thought we had issues with the 88E6390 where the PCS does not
> > > update the MAC with its results. Isn't this going to break the
> > > 6390? Andrew?
> > > 
> > 
> > Russell, I tested this patch on Turris MOX with 6390 on port 9 (cpu
> > port) which is configured in devicetree as 2500base-x, in-band-status,
> > and it works...
> > 
> > Or will this break on user ports?
> 
> User ports is what needs testing, ideally with an SFP.
> 
> There used to be explicit code which when the SERDES reported link up,
> the MAC was configured in software with the correct speed etc. With
> the move to pcs APIs, it is less obvious how this works now, does it
> still software configure the MAC, or do we have the right magic so
> that the hardware updates itself.

It's still there. The speed/duplex etc are read from the serdes PHY
via mv88e6390_serdes_pcs_get_state(). When the link comes up, we
pass the negotiated link parameters read from there to the link_up()
functions. For ports where mv88e6xxx_port_ppu_updates() returns false
(no external PHY) we update the port's speed and duplex setting and
(currently, before this patch) force the link up.

That was the behaviour before I converted the code, the one that you
referred to. I had assumed the code was correct, and _none_ of the
speed, duplex, nor link state was propagated from the serdes PCS to
the port on the 88E6390 - hence why the code you refer to existed.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!