Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>,
        Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        mptcp@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <cover.1603102503.git.geliangtang@gmail.com>
 <7766357d-0838-1603-9967-8910aa312f65@tessares.net>
 <20201019134048.11c75c9a@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
From:   Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Subject: Re: [MPTCP][PATCH net-next 0/2] init ahmac and port of
 mptcp_options_received
Message-ID: <91a59216-a1c7-1ffe-c263-b3bddcd2d801@tessares.net>
Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:18:38 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.3.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201019134048.11c75c9a@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jakub,

On 19/10/2020 22:40, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:27:55 +0200 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> Hi Geliang,
>>
>> On 19/10/2020 12:23, Geliang Tang wrote:
>>> This patchset deals with initializations of mptcp_options_received's two
>>> fields, ahmac and port.
>>>
>>> Geliang Tang (2):
>>>     mptcp: initialize mptcp_options_received's ahmac
>>>     mptcp: move mptcp_options_received's port initialization
>>
>> Thank you for these two patches. They look good to me except one detail:
>> these two patches are for -net and not net-next.
>>
>> I don't know if it is alright for Jakub to apply them to -net or if it
>> is clearer to re-send them with an updated subject.
>>
>> If it is OK to apply them to -net without a re-submit, here is my:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
> 
> Thanks, I can apply to net.

Great, thank you!

BTW, nice work with the maintenance of Net! More reasons for davem to 
take time recovering :)

> 
>> Also, if you don't mind and while I am here, I never know: is it OK for
>> you the maintainers to send one Acked/Reviewed-by for a whole series --
>> but then this is not reflected on patchwork -- or should we send one tag
>> for each patch?
> 
> It's fine, we propagate those semi-manually, but it's not a problem.
> Hopefully patchwork will address this at some point :(

Thank you for your reply, good to know!

Then next time, I will send these tags per patch to save you some 
semi-manual operations :)

Some preparation works have been done on patchwork side but the feature 
is not available yet:

   https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/113

Hopefully soon!

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net