Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp4588614pxu; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:30:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZi4/9NlObK530JXuL0loFuub4IBsovwuWqRLvLjgl3MONOO+lPcmbgzB1lRw9i0T4AGJJ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:13d8:: with SMTP id a24mr1515444edx.250.1603261852910; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:30:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603261852; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DXR11kSXm3PzgezrVFkbajar7WDBUmY5BCI6bzJ6hsgol5Vxw3q7rKi6v1H1KMP6uB QAang+V1hTJ+QW+8WUwdyHIqHcdoZwb+bThgxNvmg9/ZHbb1/chVkj0ChfKBu4mIem/X iekJcD0hcGRyidg9fxKUI0TcaNl9mEMJP41B2p06+DKViGP1LgDjDyRqArprt/LINi3J 6rjbl6pvFfWgSw0Uk+ZR16bJK4i7EdT21Ek7BSLKT7MCoyqTj25ZMoLUwAz62JmnrY70 M4rFjgChbAGNcvDAi1MV4Kp+oi0eyeh/Z902ImBDtPGPRlXtN6yqw7aih6/0ZhpigooQ nf/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=xlUtwF1lnsGVzDxiv3yQhZPuTxBMktBo9AhP5trFqJ0=; b=rDeAfqN8CWF+ZyXR3HL/chiwiuVB4EFUOBvdyGVHGgAU+wDX59mHzr993PGg3u96q4 NQs3nw91aYofx74MwaQbU4g3+nH2Ygn9S2MzVttHXY3fTaNFW982B0pMT6qiJAh8Bxkl NL3TPJ9JgkqXsYBqG00eSCj+B0/QPMcNjPvyy/t8xBdnyxP/lbuIowDoWgZtX2GhA10D psE2Ulx1y6H8xF9Is4zPA4JAwwFXam+Ng7/MIVCPdlpO5baDdEj+J5Jyv7Z/dTpO+bI1 FWi1RageJD9jNeQQwn/IMyUl07XRjdNKwqgcPv/XP3xmqqfDoZRO9b+l4P1/kDqxK9NT bh/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s19si678267ejx.504.2020.10.20.23.30.30; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:30:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2437026AbgJTP7c (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:59:32 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:53652 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2436998AbgJTP7b (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:59:31 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A961FB; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.255]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D5733F66B; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:59:22 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Vidya Sagar Cc: jingoohan1@gmail.com, gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com, bhelgaas@google.com, amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk, robh@kernel.org, treding@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kthota@nvidia.com, mmaddireddy@nvidia.com, sagar.tv@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Use ATU regions to map memory regions Message-ID: <20201020155922.GA27985@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20201005121351.32516-1-vidyas@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201005121351.32516-1-vidyas@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:43:51PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote: > Use ATU region-3 and region-0 to setup mapping for prefetchable and > non-prefetchable memory regions respectively only if their respective CPU > and bus addresses are different. > The commit subject and log must be rewritten. You should describe why you are making this change, add a Link: tag to the discussion we had about this change and provide a reason why we are making it. Also, please add a Fixes: tag reference to the commit you are fixing. I think this is related to prefetchable handling in DT and dwc/tegra, we do need a link to those discussions here please. > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar > --- > .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 12 ++--- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 4 +- > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > index 317ff512f8df..cefde8e813e9 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > @@ -515,9 +515,40 @@ static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops = { > .write = pci_generic_config_write, > }; > > +static void dw_pcie_setup_mem_atu(struct pcie_port *pp, > + struct resource_entry *win) > +{ > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > + > + if (win->res->flags & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH && pci->num_viewport >= 4 && > + win->offset) { > + dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pci, > + PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX3, > + PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM, > + win->res->start, > + win->res->start - win->offset, > + resource_size(win->res)); > + } else if (win->res->flags & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH && > + pci->num_viewport < 4) { > + dev_warn(pci->dev, > + "Insufficient ATU regions to map Prefetchable memory\n"); > + } else if (win->offset) { > + if (upper_32_bits(resource_size(win->res))) > + dev_warn(pci->dev, > + "Memory resource size exceeds max for 32 bits\n"); > + dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pci, > + PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0, > + PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM, > + win->res->start, > + win->res->start - win->offset, > + resource_size(win->res)); > + } This function logic must be explained - anyone else reading it should be able to understand it, I think it really deserves a comment. > +} > + > void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp) > { > u32 val, ctrl, num_ctrls; > + struct resource_entry *win; > struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > > /* > @@ -572,13 +603,14 @@ void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp) > * ATU, so we should not program the ATU here. > */ > if (pp->bridge->child_ops == &dw_child_pcie_ops) { > - struct resource_entry *entry = > - resource_list_first_type(&pp->bridge->windows, IORESOURCE_MEM); > + resource_list_for_each_entry(win, &pp->bridge->windows) { > + switch (resource_type(win->res)) { > + case IORESOURCE_MEM: > + dw_pcie_setup_mem_atu(pp, win); > + break; > + } Nit: an if statement would do but that's not where the problem lies. > + } > > - dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pci, PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0, > - PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM, entry->res->start, > - entry->res->start - entry->offset, > - resource_size(entry->res)); > if (pci->num_viewport > 2) > dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pci, PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX2, > PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO, pp->io_base, > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > index 3c1f17c78241..6033689abb15 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg, > static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, > int index, int type, > u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, > - u32 size) > + u64 size) > { > u32 retries, val; > u64 limit_addr = cpu_addr + size - 1; > @@ -244,8 +244,10 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, > lower_32_bits(pci_addr)); > dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_UPPER_TARGET, > upper_32_bits(pci_addr)); > - dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_REGION_CTRL1, > - type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no)); > + val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no); > + val = upper_32_bits(size - 1) ? > + val | PCIE_ATU_INCREASE_REGION_SIZE : val; > + dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_REGION_CTRL1, val); > dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_REGION_CTRL2, > PCIE_ATU_ENABLE); > > @@ -266,7 +268,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, > > static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, > int index, int type, u64 cpu_addr, > - u64 pci_addr, u32 size) > + u64 pci_addr, u64 size) > { > u32 retries, val; > > @@ -310,7 +312,7 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, > } > > void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type, > - u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u32 size) > + u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size) > { > __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pci, 0, index, type, > cpu_addr, pci_addr, size); > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > index 97c7063b9e89..b81a1813cf9e 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > @@ -80,10 +80,12 @@ > #define PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT 0x900 > #define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INBOUND BIT(31) > #define PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND 0 > +#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX3 0x3 > #define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX2 0x2 > #define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1 0x1 > #define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0 0x0 > #define PCIE_ATU_CR1 0x904 > +#define PCIE_ATU_INCREASE_REGION_SIZE BIT(13) > #define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM 0x0 > #define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO 0x2 > #define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0 0x4 > @@ -295,7 +297,7 @@ void dw_pcie_upconfig_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci); > int dw_pcie_wait_for_link(struct dw_pcie *pci); > void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, > int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, > - u32 size); > + u64 size); > void dw_pcie_prog_ep_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index, > int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, > u32 size); > -- > 2.17.1 >