Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp4981971pxu; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:01:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZl2CHyzNyGkQTBntVmRqlBcqOkPi9lWxcY4cL8Idy72QKQ6eKnh6tFHIlOgaeSJAWqf6z X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c948:: with SMTP id h8mr3862605edt.171.1603299715447; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:01:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603299715; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OqtUnLCBi0pxEEDd0qr0GP84ib0tBBPAraxsD4YX2dL9DqwFy7RrfjX9boJii7KsE8 lGtuqYdsBYGsctyahJgqFRSbNQQ0JBBzKJH3UZlO/rXKmrFgsMwu2ifoRKgkotkolA4o cz2seOajV+g5aXJgltYn+N5+5WM1pqWprwlKdf72CK9qKxzc7+TpLKe4srU5DGxb9Gmt U/CY8EJHs0htsx0QXf/CPqtoWglATYO6U0zwQm7X3m/v0euBYKBMNfRcdeivxBJ49Jl1 CPqKpqkVhBEE1c2Y7qqMux60fdWHytCee8/THmmNtrfqftmftKluTM1qzgdcAxkcCJxr XBng== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Ya63ax0jscHW6hyrpxN9iAsNnR4ykcXT93kRHwbbW+E=; b=zDPiDJSej3YUw2L53LUrAwUwRCcT9lMlS2h36hLpCy61JONBAqLZwDj8epcFC7GtJm 8glkOwg/VoZP/hNqZ6ucGjLGAEtJDGHkUOnquvlzJDlXG2XJREj3Quqx8efYBD+uPvlZ x2MG6VtZecS50fY7WpfO1yydi5a74u274eCZv2mQEbNW/T47C7ycvhlBpRTTYZST+F8q F3DkbIuNNvu1iyWKOX0zjVB3xkPyqzj9u818Hv/bmwp/nzwXAT5oNZUrGwnCC7LnbnBs 8y72zbaVbZXuj3WyjlWkvIr3KZwo/8d5rocGhHbpzyPJQ0pXgmeoi/QrsHAoLbdq0c89 ps+A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=2oH7zma9; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x9si1760311ejn.285.2020.10.21.10.01.31; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:01:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=2oH7zma9; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390113AbgJTS1J (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:27:09 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48150 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729045AbgJTS1J (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:27:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.1.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D14CB20BED; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 18:27:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603218429; bh=syF2yjpdpv6c6cBwA8S43bD1UXqKlZkbBSViMVykC9o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=2oH7zma9kUc8nVWM9keXK5k/FJ9VCUK19MGKEFn2QD7Mh1kQ54OJByq/0UTUjxoIr 5zeTNGYHnqFjnTQWjGSOLyAS63Ov9cSIr3Aq6t/dtLX2AenO6dOid8w76U2gYr/UOz +6kWzb9C+NaZxNBdNOYciRnoRnsQ4pvHUzEQ1QLU= Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:27:07 -0700 From: jaegeuk@kernel.org To: Can Guo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] scsi: ufs: use WQ_HIGHPRI for gating work Message-ID: <20201020182707.GA1087816@google.com> References: <20201005223635.2922805-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20201005223635.2922805-3-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <5c383fd90a0e97dbd1fffc35574133c9@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5c383fd90a0e97dbd1fffc35574133c9@codeaurora.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/20, Can Guo wrote: > On 2020-10-06 06:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > From: Jaegeuk Kim > > > > Must have WQ_MEM_RECLAIM > > ``WQ_MEM_RECLAIM`` > > All wq which might be used in the memory reclaim paths **MUST** > > have this flag set. The wq is guaranteed to have at least one > > execution context regardless of memory pressure. > > > > The commit msg is not telling the same story as the change/title does. This message explains why we need to keep WQ_MEM_RECLAIM when adding WQ_HIGHPRI. Thanks, > > Regards, > > Can Guo. > > > Cc: Alim Akhtar > > Cc: Avri Altman > > Cc: Can Guo > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim > > --- > > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > index 0bb07b50bd23e..76e95963887be 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > @@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_gating(struct ufs_hba > > *hba) > > snprintf(wq_name, ARRAY_SIZE(wq_name), "ufs_clk_gating_%d", > > hba->host->host_no); > > hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(wq_name, > > - WQ_MEM_RECLAIM); > > + WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI); > > > > hba->clk_gating.is_enabled = true;