Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp5367871pxu; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 23:38:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJye85r1JP/pqicp6w0WpGO7XRg/DjOqR+06lWE8B4gFT5LbNSZc9QcsjhS21Vyt4BbbL9Mc X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1042:: with SMTP id oy2mr872845ejb.64.1603348687236; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 23:38:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603348687; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YNY52HaTPvDPQB3HuKuqdM2O27IQyMQ+KybFNk85ft8eAOFcS/WS3Th5nYNQQ6Hce4 kzwpUXJS60KpnXmj7i1uLiqmtJs6aA54LbOX8YqRMr+dO7r5HqhzOVyMKUnWO5cLnadA +YygDRNfa0hIHsg5mQM3M9m46No9iYp9bGZaLAVrrBy21FP5acPLXEP+WXwexdDCmJWe YqQm/uNSLAb/g0y/+7pnKLba0uPmEZIWOPe15JMM2wCieOjHhZJiPKD7UOunF5gWB94e QRksh6JcXUeL+br2Gn6X1xs19nzG0wMB+jb0nJQXKN82t0RVuFLGZKDt0VmZWaBk1kUh 3omQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=GDRf8ABUu+TZaWK0lYE+MAlDPbiqs8UpaJTToDFItts=; b=xep2iIKkYiiJR+esTiOM17fXr8Auzo0nUF+2CUKGclS4lI7VOCN4hBtL8i6/cs3/Wy HzcF2XjvtjYghI1PgMT5sjcEzjCioRIPrPSRMaI79t/CjqUAqwheXV5MoGCPWsXAyTdW k5aHZmyc5tUf1hKLnHQk6VknXzDEQ75zQhjRgMDAWktubB0cZStH5q6zg0+vKR3ehrr6 aM33lzmq7qy+AswnFBcBIoDwMuD4loH202XaPtUENudDH/Hb4I37ieiiDXIFuLwzVSSG 4XUh9Gkj/7nHrDfnLXns1egbC9IkZtfcSos3+ISciB7AYXP2F4YxFjkJr4sycjaRvJrl Fs/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=LlHb740U; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id sa7si351213ejb.618.2020.10.21.23.37.44; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 23:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=LlHb740U; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2504595AbgJUS7v (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:59:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50684 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2504594AbgJUS7v (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:59:51 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x543.google.com (mail-ed1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::543]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7955FC0613D2 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x543.google.com with SMTP id x1so3672263eds.1 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:59:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GDRf8ABUu+TZaWK0lYE+MAlDPbiqs8UpaJTToDFItts=; b=LlHb740UPxtxMP1zvZIGPA/lPoD9hh7cNYpX8bNSMxy2cki0zar6/kZRNh0S/E0qPa ZpW4b/leM0+bY946rUTzSmq/7g3ri2RkNzbtHgOg4PsM+KUBcOCcVeKNeanRm84wcu/W XOLQ77AHYidJJUWKsJxnqTUekRBiQRbwXSBG2jlE4qdoEJfy409qyTvxRYnPU5bIQb+U bf906IePyxRHDp6qAfLZ/tVAqrc0wSIsu+4XCZIej2gYYhK1Kj6IeIArk+F37RNo6Hm5 mBLTs8l1AL21QQMBFirH7aP1YUylC1F8+nuxuBwX/Huc7Cd864psezEXx9wpo6JKELw9 5LxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GDRf8ABUu+TZaWK0lYE+MAlDPbiqs8UpaJTToDFItts=; b=jfYPgRWTsspLAA9yH2KGps70NLpOFP+t/WY/SBcRLVDrR7x8t0t0I+rrFARtoKu/ch uKUyWno58A8i13y/r582KHdgjRrElxMVVKqRDpuyNwOwEJkVtjJHNDpGtST3Gewi/aUe uVemei6Tt9I5r8kF20D4JBedP6JJMfw7dNLXsvAa6eqp3H3qdbG46q6wfo6kSYdaNLkW d43/2kWSGrxxi/ecAuP5pxkYxGmE2sFEHg/a6jtAQSBAIwfW2rrdoau7p2z763AneHbS tHRcixZNhHCB180CklVlT9YNG9K7gFXCV0wgC1rtGM1dJNT1tRCnrStIzTQy8puXKanF x6Qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53339v1aYthbGD6lUmSfNxv7T1L1oldnWfI2ghSgVCbrmxt93tzR MWf+M05OWk91BdCFYxnsTsau8H8dcaW/Vf9if/XJyw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cd1a:: with SMTP id b26mr4390509edw.97.1603306788939; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:59:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201021085655.1192025-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201021085655.1192025-15-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> In-Reply-To: <20201021085655.1192025-15-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> From: Dan Williams Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:59:37 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/16] resource: Move devmem revoke code to resource framework To: Daniel Vetter Cc: DRI Development , LKML , KVM list , Linux MM , Linux ARM , linux-samsung-soc , "Linux-media@vger.kernel.org" , linux-s390 , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Daniel Vetter , Jason Gunthorpe , Kees Cook , Andrew Morton , John Hubbard , =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Jan Kara , Arnd Bergmann , David Hildenbrand , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Vetter Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 1:57 AM Daniel Vetter wrot= e: > > We want all iomem mmaps to consistently revoke ptes when the kernel > takes over and CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM is enabled. This includes the > pci bar mmaps available through procfs and sysfs, which currently do > not revoke mappings. > > To prepare for this, move the code from the /dev/kmem driver to > kernel/resource.c. > > Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe > Cc: Kees Cook > Cc: Dan Williams > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: John Hubbard > Cc: J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me Glisse > Cc: Jan Kara > Cc: Dan Williams > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Arnd Bergmann > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: David Hildenbrand > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > -- > v3: > - add barrier for consistency and document why we don't have to check > for NULL (Jason) > --- > drivers/char/mem.c | 85 +--------------------------------- > include/linux/ioport.h | 6 +-- > kernel/resource.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c > index 5502f56f3655..53338aad8d28 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/mem.c > +++ b/drivers/char/mem.c > @@ -31,9 +31,6 @@ > #include > #include > #include > -#include > -#include > -#include > > #ifdef CONFIG_IA64 > # include > @@ -809,42 +806,6 @@ static loff_t memory_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t= offset, int orig) > return ret; > } > > -static struct inode *devmem_inode; > - > -#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM > -void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res) > -{ > - /* pairs with smp_store_release() in devmem_init_inode() */ > - struct inode *inode =3D smp_load_acquire(&devmem_inode); > - > - /* > - * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race > - * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before > - * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent /dev/mem from > - * establishing mappings. > - */ > - if (!inode) > - return; > - > - /* > - * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked > - * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed() > - * should start returning false, however for performance this > - * does not iterate the entire resource range. > - */ > - if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) && > - devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) { > - /* > - * *cringe* iomem=3Drelaxed says "go ahead, what's the > - * worst that can happen?" > - */ > - return; > - } > - > - unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(r= es), 1); > -} > -#endif > - > static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) > { > int rc; > @@ -864,7 +825,7 @@ static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file= *filp) > * revocations when drivers want to take over a /dev/mem mapped > * range. > */ > - filp->f_mapping =3D inode->i_mapping; > + filp->f_mapping =3D iomem_get_mapping(); > > return 0; > } > @@ -995,48 +956,6 @@ static char *mem_devnode(struct device *dev, umode_t= *mode) > > static struct class *mem_class; > > -static int devmem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc) > -{ > - return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM; > -} > - > -static struct file_system_type devmem_fs_type =3D { > - .name =3D "devmem", > - .owner =3D THIS_MODULE, > - .init_fs_context =3D devmem_fs_init_fs_context, > - .kill_sb =3D kill_anon_super, > -}; > - > -static int devmem_init_inode(void) > -{ > - static struct vfsmount *devmem_vfs_mount; > - static int devmem_fs_cnt; > - struct inode *inode; > - int rc; > - > - rc =3D simple_pin_fs(&devmem_fs_type, &devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_= fs_cnt); > - if (rc < 0) { > - pr_err("Cannot mount /dev/mem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", r= c); > - return rc; > - } > - > - inode =3D alloc_anon_inode(devmem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb); > - if (IS_ERR(inode)) { > - rc =3D PTR_ERR(inode); > - pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for /dev/mem: %d\n", rc); > - simple_release_fs(&devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_fs_cnt); > - return rc; > - } > - > - /* > - * Publish /dev/mem initialized. > - * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_devmem(). > - */ > - smp_store_release(&devmem_inode, inode); > - > - return 0; > -} > - > static int __init chr_dev_init(void) > { > int minor; > @@ -1058,8 +977,6 @@ static int __init chr_dev_init(void) > */ > if ((minor =3D=3D DEVPORT_MINOR) && !arch_has_dev_port()) > continue; > - if ((minor =3D=3D DEVMEM_MINOR) && devmem_init_inode() != =3D 0) > - continue; > > device_create(mem_class, NULL, MKDEV(MEM_MAJOR, minor), > NULL, devlist[minor].name); > diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h > index 6c2b06fe8beb..8ffb61b36606 100644 > --- a/include/linux/ioport.h > +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h > @@ -302,11 +302,7 @@ struct resource *devm_request_free_mem_region(struct= device *dev, > struct resource *request_free_mem_region(struct resource *base, > unsigned long size, const char *name); > > -#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM > -void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res); > -#else > -static inline void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res) { }; > -#endif > +extern struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void); > > #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ > #endif /* _LINUX_IOPORT_H */ > diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c > index 841737bbda9e..a92fed5b9997 100644 > --- a/kernel/resource.c > +++ b/kernel/resource.c > @@ -18,12 +18,15 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > +#include > #include > > > @@ -1112,6 +1115,58 @@ resource_size_t resource_alignment(struct resource= *res) > > static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(muxed_resource_wait); > > +static struct inode *iomem_inode; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM > +static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res) > +{ > + /* pairs with smp_store_release() in iomem_init_inode() */ > + struct inode *inode =3D smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode); > + > + /* > + * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race > + * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before > + * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent /dev/mem from How about: s,/dev/mem,iomem_get_mapping() users, ...now that this facility is generalized? > + * establishing mappings. > + */ > + if (!inode) > + return; > + > + /* > + * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked > + * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed() > + * should start returning false, however for performance this > + * does not iterate the entire resource range. > + */ > + if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) && > + devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) { > + /* > + * *cringe* iomem=3Drelaxed says "go ahead, what's the > + * worst that can happen?" > + */ > + return; > + } > + > + unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(r= es), 1); > +} > +struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void) > +{ > + /* > + * This function is only called from file open paths, hence guara= nteed > + * that fs_initcalls have completed and no need to check for NULL= . But > + * since revoke_iomem can be called before the initcall we still = need > + * the barrier to appease checkers. > + */ > + return smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode)->i_mapping; > +} > +#else > +static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res) {} > +struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void) > +{ > + return NULL; > +} > +#endif > + > /** > * __request_region - create a new busy resource region > * @parent: parent resource descriptor > @@ -1179,7 +1234,7 @@ struct resource * __request_region(struct resource = *parent, > write_unlock(&resource_lock); > > if (res && orig_parent =3D=3D &iomem_resource) > - revoke_devmem(res); > + revoke_iomem(res); > > return res; > } > @@ -1713,4 +1768,48 @@ static int __init strict_iomem(char *str) > return 1; > } > > +static int iomem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc) > +{ > + return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM; > +} > + > +static struct file_system_type iomem_fs_type =3D { > + .name =3D "iomem", > + .owner =3D THIS_MODULE, > + .init_fs_context =3D iomem_fs_init_fs_context, > + .kill_sb =3D kill_anon_super, > +}; > + > +static int __init iomem_init_inode(void) > +{ > + static struct vfsmount *iomem_vfs_mount; > + static int iomem_fs_cnt; > + struct inode *inode; > + int rc; > + > + rc =3D simple_pin_fs(&iomem_fs_type, &iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_= cnt); > + if (rc < 0) { > + pr_err("Cannot mount iomem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", rc); > + return rc; > + } > + > + inode =3D alloc_anon_inode(iomem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb); > + if (IS_ERR(inode)) { > + rc =3D PTR_ERR(inode); > + pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for iomem: %d\n", rc); > + simple_release_fs(&iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_cnt); > + return rc; > + } > + > + /* > + * Publish /dev/mem initialized. Similar potential fixup: "Publish iomem revocation inode initialized" Other than that: Reviewed-by: Dan Williams