Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200629003127.GB5535@shao2-debian> <20200630124628.GV4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20200630144905.GX4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <58ff47cc-dc55-e383-7a5b-37008d145aba@gmail.com>
 <20201021080031.GY2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20201021131806.GA2176@tucnak>
 <20201021134436.GJ2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <CAKwvOd=qi63We=6rLapb565giCVe-8a6d=-=3VZL6RWzhwAeZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANiq72m+_QYtn_1gyrjXFs6yeDdiMoS4DVcWqYcTgyCFnSFXbw@mail.gmail.com> <3ec15b41754b01666d94b76ce51b9832c2dd577a.camel@perches.com>
In-Reply-To: <3ec15b41754b01666d94b76ce51b9832c2dd577a.camel@perches.com>
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:27:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CANiq72kfuDfHeL9Eb9e7PccZ+L9wMpnBj_gtFj3-aFfcvYuskA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GCC section alignment, and GCC-4.9 being a weird one
To:     Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        dwaipayanray1@gmail.com, Aditya <yashsri421@gmail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@kernel.org>,
        LKP <lkp@lists.01.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 8:35 PM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
>
> Perhaps something to add as a generic test in checkpatch.

Agreed! It would be nice to check all of them. Even checking for
`attribute` and `__attribute__` could be potentially reasonable (i.e.
so that people are reminded to consider adding whatever attributes
they need into `compiler_attributes.h`), although perhaps too
annoying/noisy for some (e.g. for `arch/*` devs...).

Cheers,
Miguel