Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
CC:     SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com>,
        SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>,
        "Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kunit: tool: Mark 'kunittest_config' as constant again
Date:   Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:35:26 +0200
Message-ID: <20201022063526.12554-1-sjpark@amazon.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFd5g44CxPuXbHund397PJSQPHGhWy1-7ij7JnJNzCO0NF6dCA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:32:52 -0700 Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 3:27 AM SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
> >
> > 'kunit_kernel.kunittest_config' was constant at first, and therefore it
> > used UPPER_SNAKE_CASE naming convention that usually means it is
> > constant in Python world.  But, commit e3212513a8f0 ("kunit: Create
> > default config in '--build_dir'") made it modifiable to fix a use case
> > of the tool and thus the naming also changed to lower_snake_case.
> > However, this resulted in a confusion.  As a result, some successing
> > changes made the tool unittest fail, and a fix[1] of it again incurred
> > the '--build_dir' use case failure.
> >
> > As the previous commit fixed the '--build_dir' use case without
> > modifying the variable again, this commit marks the variable as constant
> > again with UPPER_SNAKE_CASE, to reduce future confusions.
> >
> > [1] Commit d43c7fb05765 ("kunit: tool: fix improper treatment of file location")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>

Thanks :)

> 
> Thanks for this! This is something I meant to fix a while ago and forgot about.
> 
> One minor issue, this patch does not apply on torvalds/master right
> now. Could you please rebase this?

Surely of course, I will send next version soon.


Thanks,
SeongJae Park