Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp5427686pxu; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 01:52:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjjwrzVkIjl5Ux4Ha7vxxhIoaKB8E4mUq6o7H7oP7VEDTPQjNcevbU9MGPWmM9Isgwmclv X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1482:: with SMTP id e2mr1320146edv.36.1603356762917; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 01:52:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603356762; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Z6VOGpO3ua6ZvhAhKFtShnYij5t3R9QJhN8qr/wgQzSxoVNEHIL+0lvDTa+VbE98z2 epLXTBcr7HsVaPEZzuLWj0vwrQn/9IZhHferaINtN74VVh2d6Q3+jZjDC9x34qX2MfgI UEhjy2jQZtz2TrQux9o84RnvfP3x0cxZCNB5LDoyLSkM5KLLXSSJDbrNGxqpNJ1eYGOJ BF5uM+uVfAoVMN4A2gWMX/ZXmExCxhZswwtR+NoDAimEOtpaR7k7KLYWMs/HOFBpGHlq 1D7ebeaFjeSHN3g6CDmpRc6OopAAU4h/nCxEKWE943QxtRaKsnxxaETGdygEJ3WSpr7s R01Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=PJhajxumMH247/2PmuCDRDeXKoKcrmBkye7QYn1akpU=; b=skU8lw0xjOX9tDScXty9K5iQTGzgEmgxA4FuI0disisG2zE9df8cV6YkhUVY5wxl+B 5Rj+pb9wj/RUfzJVm1yfpkLkLkg/dhBocxzztpj+a6lTiR9eCUvflvTktBnIQciamreh vyfpHlnT0VQPr9u94j1yEWNT1WYstXK94MKOvAdjms7Ehqf68JIA3h5netSHXxQTU2+/ D9wbzLrhTpypWslw3vesa3O7QH3/7aMG0ozP5QBTHNNSKJL/AAzSummxudBYI7zE4GDx DtBMt7KxeH5yqEHhxioVgpgt6YSDuws3hMW7J/ynfgZd/caMLSApQHjZ9dfYfKkd0s5W jKvg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 3si416422ejz.513.2020.10.22.01.52.19; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 01:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2508719AbgJVHkX (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Oct 2020 03:40:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54756 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2506715AbgJVHkW (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2020 03:40:22 -0400 Received: from smtp2-2.goneo.de (smtp2.goneo.de [IPv6:2001:1640:5::8:33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BD2CC0613CE for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 00:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.goneo.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E9223FC61; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:40:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by goneo X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.974 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.974 tagged_above=-999 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, AWL=-0.074, BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp2.goneo.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.goneo.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fppe8Uv8iBUp; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:40:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lem-wkst-02.lemonage (hq.lemonage.de [87.138.178.34]) by smtp2.goneo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6793B23F497; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:40:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:40:11 +0200 From: Lars Poeschel To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Willy Tarreau , Ksenija Stanojevic , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/32] Make charlcd device independent Message-ID: <20201022074011.w5hvw4ssvhhfdsh4@lem-wkst-02.lemonage> References: <20201005122732.3429347-1-poeschel@lemonage.de> <20201006083834.ejbl5itjvkbqbmby@lem-wkst-02.lemonage> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 05:59:04AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 4:33 AM Miguel Ojeda > wrote: > > > > Picking these for linux-next (including Rob's Reviewed-by). I have > > spotted a few typos that I corrected -- I will note them by email. > > Hmm, I think we should do another round instead, since I found what > looks to be an unintended revert of a previous commit in patch 24. > Lars, can you please take a look? I will work on this soon. > Also, please take the chance to apply my comments given we have a new > round (and Rob's Reviewed-by too). Yes, of course. > By the way, I think you could simplify by squashing the "implement > hd44780_*" commits together (i.e. from 15 to 22 except 20), and the > two cleanups together too (i.e. 20 and 23). I know we asked you to > split things up before, but those two sets are quite similar > (including in their commit message) and easy to understand all > together. No problem. I will do this as well. Regards, Lars