Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp5780527pxu; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:50:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwczHmn+lo0C3+sTbaDLYDnZAxmXkH2Rc3/L/hHyDvZJxVSjp7/L8rF/PAqeAyxOJHrzY/V X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:139a:: with SMTP id f26mr3376784ejc.472.1603389017396; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:50:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603389017; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oc6WWg7KmmOmLuh2vhKKwfzz7sjCoJ0U0yMYK9WMS4BALAfSJUNNz1Qf+z8ZEtMY+5 P5Qq3VphSdCiXNJT5vo1jkYW+PPN9Io9Bv7pzcj8hDvY2J9pBR3dXYrVsJlpZIvbN/7Q dS+aFWGjzWWkHyW9JUuQePFGCR6QZAW6xBBYN4zo538hdvgZU4L6HB63tlyCNm/9o5M/ fItIwsLEZs4IGV7XhB5o8Cb71Lxk5Lxh2U++VqOOXA63ibm7Gg9+m8GO7VjdGDN2Iuco CPUshGRf2LS7SvLDHbSUXPzM+dzKA3Q8cZgxWJYIR2wfsm/VOmc7pEz1nMa7ont2fmG5 ErJQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=MMaUMBupo+aMZow4IDwl1t08XFtpsf1GwqJ0/qCgZAo=; b=0jvYjOs+GZhqZCeaLCbz2A0+W+SRZM6yJRzps+UVufbuxroXXt8FsOZRlCvC0CsFAP 7BCSGpyzc/P9redZyiKErsxppJw1tXpHwTNpsNLL1zTTtMx1xbRZOAa4E2laSyIeAUJ5 3aVrywR+I7KrXnkmnyFbQzbpdC8zd+Ze1BO8GSAT08zZD/97eoi0p/o60SAh3nZDvjmg qbZyEVJPjEk2l/GtNtp9hqdfk/meEsmAQbgb0VQFHst7UA6ze2ZCj8PkNnAayqOUxxoT ht4MMEW4Km5FU88l1tAeSvsp+WCfPNMBjXSplwo5gMUo3ueTy/NcmIDgKYggtU7EUgDp jRCQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Td0672p7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s3si1373714ejj.426.2020.10.22.10.49.54; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Td0672p7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2901068AbgJVOpB (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:45:01 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:52173 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2901062AbgJVOpB (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:45:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603377899; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MMaUMBupo+aMZow4IDwl1t08XFtpsf1GwqJ0/qCgZAo=; b=Td0672p7zqPwWSDSRfJEkVFsxAGqVrLi+2c3pSOpmclJhnF0iBnTpgG1wi7rY0U2V95grI oDi68eltcxkemI430RlT962ITaU8jRmv7jDexghaRcmFTHW2Yiudc/hVa79r80Upbl7MOc oRjx7W8+W9aEmpuMx7V9jG8/asUNkDU= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-282-E6CbuAFlN72ated3sKJx-g-1; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:44:56 -0400 X-MC-Unique: E6CbuAFlN72ated3sKJx-g-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id f26so366803wml.1 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 07:44:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MMaUMBupo+aMZow4IDwl1t08XFtpsf1GwqJ0/qCgZAo=; b=SOoAqYAhwNk9gsMDQjL6i/lqFhFrGodpHXOAlIlwsAl292e+4t9VQlwBvzjzElFIm7 15Pzb09bA/qJwoijkwdhsWpfv5cGxl6Whx7vVzxam0R5b055QCcYwj9j2PYr/Egwn6tc SNgxg4yjeSpGnKGZTCwLGMo3Onoh+R4IMN7P9OFfVoSkijymSJJUAf5EnB+umkmernAY HqEr3mV4/FhVTdFI9qHbF4MwkLtLpIOvAuGwv8LzwkxS2p6b+IgtFTy+dlK2DMkCQIBX MjkgDxHosOSPaXxaY2a6m7BXopWqCQdyeIHN4U2CNs1SjZzUAvIqfY+jGO2mLHKWs9dU LVCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WD7hOkwn3aoCpLiWikBNkXbMwnSGq+gf0gAHSCiidjM5np0V+ 4AVdMLEpKWKB+b0F+dZ/rjFQmQemMhsKCXBopnQKODkV9d1IhOLstFq/y553mcdU3KsmzVsMTHg EEiZY8QefYRt/roiVDLwLEg1N X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6341:: with SMTP id b1mr3025885wrw.373.1603377895530; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 07:44:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6341:: with SMTP id b1mr3025872wrw.373.1603377895365; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 07:44:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n62sm4120086wmb.10.2020.10.22.07.44.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Oct 2020 07:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Expose KVM_HINTS_REALTIME in KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID To: Xiaoyao Li , Wanpeng Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel References: <1603330475-7063-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> <6ad94df6-9ecd-e364-296a-34ba41e938b1@intel.com> <31b189e0-503f-157d-7af0-329744ed5369@redhat.com> <18e7a0c6-faff-8c4c-0830-a0bc02627a36@intel.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4a5d0ccd-f6a7-2afe-2480-991ff7e079b4@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:44:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <18e7a0c6-faff-8c4c-0830-a0bc02627a36@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22/10/20 16:28, Xiaoyao Li wrote: > On 10/22/2020 10:06 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 22/10/20 15:31, Xiaoyao Li wrote: >>>> >>>> It's common for userspace to copy all supported CPUID bits to >>>> KVM_SET_CPUID2, I don't think this is the right behavior for >>>> KVM_HINTS_REALTIME. >>> >>> It reminds of X86_FEATURE_WAITPKG, which is added to supported CPUID >>> recently as a fix but QEMU exposes it to guest only when "-overcommit >>> cpu-pm" >> >> WAITPKG is not included in KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID either.  QEMU detects >> it through the MSR_IA32_UMWAIT register. > > Doesn't 0abcc8f65cc2 ("KVM: VMX: enable X86_FEATURE_WAITPKG in KVM > capabilities") add WAITPKG to KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID? You're right, I shouldn't have checked only cpuid.c. :) Still I think WAITPKG is different, because it's only for userspace and it's always possible for userspace to do "for(;;)" and burn CPU. KVM_HINTS_REALTIME is more similar to MONITOR, which is not set. Paolo