Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751372AbWHMTjl (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:39:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751377AbWHMTjl (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:39:41 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.12]:64845 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751372AbWHMTjk (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:39:40 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent: x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to: content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cL5WEpMvbC8gRGs85ShdbbVcGVfdl7eMq3MjCEka1HHmMNInnMZ533qHinqrn6DqJ LDSho5FMJCzzG8EyyIVqA== Message-ID: <44DF7FB9.8020003@google.com> Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:38:33 -0700 From: Daniel Phillips User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8 (X11/20060502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: jeff@garzik.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 8/9] 3c59x driver conversion References: <20060808193447.1396.59301.sendpatchset@lappy> <44D9191E.7080203@garzik.org> <44D977D8.5070306@google.com> <20060808.225537.112622421.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20060808.225537.112622421.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1232 Lines: 28 David Miller wrote: > I think he's saying that he doesn't think your code is yet a > reasonable way to solve the problem, and therefore doesn't belong > upstream. That is why it has not yet been submitted upstream. Respectfully, I do not think that jgarzik has yet put in the work to know if this anti deadlock technique is reasonable or not, and he was only commenting on some superficial blemish. I still don't get his point, if there was one. He seems to be arguing in favor of a jump-off-the-cliff approach to driver conversion. If he wants to do the work and take the blame when some driver inevitably breaks because of being edited in a hurry then he is welcome to submit the necessary additional patches. Until then, there are about 3 nics that actually matter to network storage at the moment, all of them GigE. The layer 2 blemishes can be fixed easily, including avoiding the atomic op stall and the ->dev volatility . Thankyou for pointing those out. Regards, Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/