Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751783AbWHNCBU (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:01:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751789AbWHNCBU (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:01:20 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:42703 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751783AbWHNCBU (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:01:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:00:32 +1000 From: Nathan Scott To: Jesper Juhl Cc: Avuton Olrich , "Tony. Ho" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078 Message-ID: <20060814120032.E2698880@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <3aa654a40608072039r2b5c5a19hbd3e68e4fee40869@mail.gmail.com> <20060808134438.E2526901@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <9a8748490608080137k596a6290r3567096668449a64@mail.gmail.com> <20060808185405.B2528231@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <9a8748490608100431m244207b1v9c9c5087233fcf3a@mail.gmail.com> <20060811083546.B2596458@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <9a8748490608101544n29f863e7o7584ac64f1d4c210@mail.gmail.com> <9a8748490608101552w12822fa6m415a5fb5537c744d@mail.gmail.com> <9a8748490608110133v5f973cf6w1af340f59bb229ec@mail.gmail.com> <9a8748490608110325k25c340e2yac925eb226d1fe4f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <9a8748490608110325k25c340e2yac925eb226d1fe4f@mail.gmail.com>; from jesper.juhl@gmail.com on Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:25:03PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1125 Lines: 32 On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:25:03PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > I didn't capture all of the xfs_repair output, but I did get this : > ... > Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks... > - setting up duplicate extent list... > - clear lost+found (if it exists) ... > - clearing existing "lost+found" inode > - deleting existing "lost+found" entry > - check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks... > - agno = 0 > - agno = 1 > - agno = 2 > - agno = 3 > - agno = 4 > - agno = 5 > - agno = 6 > LEAFN node level is 1 inode 412035424 bno = 8388608 Ooh. Can you describe this test case you're using? Something with a bunch of renames in it, obviously, but I'd also like to be able to reproduce locally with the exact data set (file names in particular), if at all possible. thanks! -- Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/