Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Sender: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf test: Use generic event for expand_libpfm_events()
Date:   Sat, 24 Oct 2020 11:59:17 +0900
Message-Id: <20201024025918.453431-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

I found that the UNHALTED_CORE_CYCLES event is only available in the
Intel machines and it makes other vendors/archs fail on the test.  As
libpfm4 can parse the generic events like cycles, let's use them.

Fixes: 40b74c30ffb9 ("perf test: Add expand cgroup event test")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c b/tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c
index d5771e4d094f..4c59f3ae438f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int expand_libpfm_events(void)
 	int ret;
 	struct evlist *evlist;
 	struct rblist metric_events;
-	const char event_str[] = "UNHALTED_CORE_CYCLES";
+	const char event_str[] = "CYCLES";
 	struct option opt = {
 		.value = &evlist,
 	};
-- 
2.29.0.rc1.297.gfa9743e501-goog