Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9e8c:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y12csp194056pxx; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 06:35:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5+Bj3DhwFMmr6sCGFczU0UDmV8oFZwRDo9e9TiesXe7lW06NOyKHt05nLU9oPOxDhpdTQ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ce27:: with SMTP id sd7mr14833025ejb.264.1603719354354; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 06:35:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603719354; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Bt/JVWlZcu3p4VeFPvQea5BL4ScgbWwV9lm6T58++xhyoDgH1NhYywIIKWSu/acke4 8MpArSb6VWt36pIUie7NVtSNTJ+EJ3OBGaPIFCz4bBTse7/crcSPJSnsQZyXLbZil8li KaKalVgO56bNHj0y+zmO3sZPnec2XkPhNO3gZ2ORMWrk+kWhLWjZsY6WPZSHfJioKYjK RuYr6MU4L4Bj7Satu8/KuskL1wa84yCdWCaDyKLJl25wsvMgQDEDQXSazPOJos8Of/BJ OYvtaKISye4mJtudB/Q06YyZSXRoVxjAgndzenSC4yxaPnedQLR56VzvPSMzqB0Q79UK MYCQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=bqwTbaY0zoK0LnzolQoSvx8nZf5VrMi+TXH1mZIm1BY=; b=SQCj6wS9HxUQo0Jo4ok6aa2p7MUOqiU15ZT2mDOANRzACMQyGKVoDqc1k42yoP4u1L 3sXni2be71ktWIcj6Xci3GwqJoX92A+LKzH0gjIeEbCM33RszbxP1PZZPwiCzWTBXeaI x8MEhFlyMiq53x2uPrNZW4Lf7+XXB6H60LNJ6xfE2TjdHDzfGb0zpkcYmVYyqO8mBAfM IR4eFNQvJVbRMioav8RKHWvO0bihKIq8zAimDpnPgfpDHmiQflGbWEp9D3flyiqnei3Y xTt3rkXoDbCOVtysyzLZBIVAzzXC/wpcGJOZLDJGJJV6EX0Z1egK11wY4bP425HhRxBS 6dUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=EAdhfrPj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id uz27si7034700ejb.212.2020.10.26.06.35.32; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 06:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=EAdhfrPj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1775446AbgJZMtQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:49:16 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:31864 "EHLO mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1768773AbgJZMtQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:49:16 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09QCVXgJ064124; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:49:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=bqwTbaY0zoK0LnzolQoSvx8nZf5VrMi+TXH1mZIm1BY=; b=EAdhfrPjN/L1fnbf7kipSJTrwOILJKkY6Gi7QbIUCIVRWLdCWc76SX/0aHxMvKIt4x1Z YnT5MywVU2agvsQHKlx1KY/9pfXMzRpzHkjZX8OS55+T9GUMsHCixPhEXivImOZRgEVR dLCKHnz7DYMPYBaaLbXRMgjwHU+74LF++lLeXaHAh88p++fsjxLQ3HqAtgXPaMmIa5N/ crpWlqOoiV00NHaR/HrzDqaxoig2M+4B9x3zRxnOhmFYaR0dinF2leAXgkQzdlKTU9+/ pZoEwZIeRuW8T8TVkS4aiZhZw+l98IJf2cguHNlYbQTs865Aar35rVRhmWKUcO1Umz8O Zg== Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 34dw512xj2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:49:11 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09QCkdUB020076; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:49:09 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 34cbw7t7gv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:49:09 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 09QCn7GY23396770 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:49:07 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476864C044; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:49:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FAA4C046; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:49:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.145.93.124]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:49:06 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:49:05 +0100 From: Vasily Gorbik To: Michal Kubecek Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [Regression] s390x build broken with 5.10-rc1 (bisected) Message-ID: References: <20201026104811.22ta4pby2chmz4pv@lion.mk-sys.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201026104811.22ta4pby2chmz4pv@lion.mk-sys.cz> X-Patchwork-Bot: notify X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.737 definitions=2020-10-26_06:2020-10-26,2020-10-26 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=687 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010260088 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:48:11AM +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote: > Hello, > > 5.10-rc1 builds on s390x fail with > > make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=arch/s390/boot arch/s390/boot/bzImage > make -f ./scripts/Makefile.modpost > make -f ./scripts/Makefile.modfinal > make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=arch/s390/boot/compressed arch/s390/boot/compressed/vmlinux > s1=`s390x-suse-linux-objdump -t -j ".boot.data" "vmlinux" | sort | sed -n "/0000000000000000/! s/.*\s.boot.data\s\+//p" | sha256sum`; s2=`s390x-suse-linux-objdump -t -j ".boot.data" "arch/s390/boot/compressed/vmlinux" | sort | sed -n "/0000000000000000/! s/.*\s.boot.data\s\+//p" | sha256sum`; if [ "$s1" != "$s2" ]; then echo "error: section .boot.data differs between vmlinux and arch/s390/boot/compressed/vmlinux" >&2; exit 1; fi; touch arch/s390/boot/section_cmp.boot.data > s1=`s390x-suse-linux-objdump -t -j ".boot.preserved.data" "vmlinux" | sort | sed -n "/0000000000000000/! s/.*\s.boot.preserved.data\s\+//p" | sha256sum`; s2=`s390x-suse-linux-objdump -t -j ".boot.preserved.data" "arch/s390/boot/compressed/vmlinux" | sort | sed -n "/0000000000000000/! s/.*\s.boot.preserved.data\s\+//p" | sha256sum`; if [ "$s1" != "$s2" ]; then echo "error: section .boot.preserved.data differs between vmlinux and arch/s390/boot/compressed/vmlinux" >&2; exit 1; fi; touch arch/s390/boot/section_cmp.boot.preserved.data > error: section .boot.data differs between vmlinux and arch/s390/boot/compressed/vmlinux > make[1]: *** [arch/s390/boot/Makefile:65: arch/s390/boot/section_cmp.boot.data] Error 1 > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > error: section .boot.preserved.data differs between vmlinux and arch/s390/boot/compressed/vmlinux > make[1]: *** [arch/s390/boot/Makefile:65: arch/s390/boot/section_cmp.boot.preserved.data] Error 1 > make: *** [arch/s390/Makefile:153: bzImage] Error 2 > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > Bisect identified commit 33def8498fdd ("treewide: Convert macro and uses > of __section(foo) to __section("foo")"), i.e. the very last commit > before tagging v5.10-rc1. > > I can reproduce this with e.g. defconfig and both native s390x build and > build on x86_64 using cross compiler. I used gcc 10.2.1 and binutils 2.34. > > Michal Hello Michal, I've already fixed that. The fix will appear shortly on s390/fixes Thank you for reporting! Vasily Gorbik (1): s390: correct __bootdata / __bootdata_preserved macros arch/s390/include/asm/sections.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.25.4