Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:47:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:46:54 -0500 Received: from 216-21-153-1.ip.van.radiant.net ([216.21.153.1]:10249 "HELO innerfire.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:46:44 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:49:44 -0800 (PST) From: Gerhard Mack To: J Sloan cc: Ville Herva , linux-kernel Subject: Re: Nasty suprise with uptime In-Reply-To: <3BE07D05.3B71B67D@pobox.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, J Sloan wrote: > Vile Hernia wrote: > > > BTW, on win95 the HZ is 1024, which caused it to _always_ crash if it ever > > reached 48.5 days of uptime. I've seen NT4 SMP to to crash at same point as > > well (though it doesn't do it always). > > It's funny that windoze went for years > without anybody ever realizing about > the 49 day crash - heck, one crash > every 49 days is lost in the noise on > a windoze pee cee - no wonder they > never noticed. > > OTOH, when our Linux uptimes went back > to zero at 497 days, I noticed immediately, > and screamed bloody murder until I found > it was just a timer wraparound. > Seems to be a cultural diffrence between windows and linux users. Probably something for ESR or whoever to do a paper on ;) Gerhard -- Gerhard Mack gmack@innerfire.net <>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/