Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9e8c:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y12csp536223pxx; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:34:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2dEcDOd529VNiMoC3ytkoDmrfodpoUQjQEonjiv6ZfYq8KuBVHU73mw5yONddonHyFPaz X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:430a:: with SMTP id j10mr17424058ejm.21.1603748085638; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:34:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603748085; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XLePhryJHPZiv+3lREsd9b9zxO0tttlio/yf+o+I/ZIB8A/J0Nj8OpdDmRgxnSzBjm ZRl3wNo9ZTQ4dibBp5FS792dMjcoqUKNBSpKRK15I0Z4hKDs/6vHjddaa0HSsT2nI0uO UIPFGVISlILzLHfRkNJyYSRvBEyqeaSFcD60VCgJ0itQZEu35hRJcUjPTOEkzv2ymzo5 jaMJP3x53WSvUNUo2JcRU2+WzUihUCCHJx0Z9+TsnZVWpy15YRjq9nXvhgwQ1PXzhm0G SSPTl/7rWvTzORkpTdUVg66H0OVKPvubAiOfzugqWXHU0DAQ8iXYs2JiPYf0d19bKHlZ bv0g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to :date:references:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=EtQ7ATZf42jwj5zA9pcp/oVxiJsLAJssQKkbBhG+zyg=; b=MRcaNAAMHzqZ3g5eEOhqFPGKikoK7RRlWjI1PZvfaUT5DNcGlh/D7kfDQpyyLExYgE muQIjeGOmucBA5qaGc8+A99Poa24J60gdTpdtNOXwiXkZJgMSboTxm5O4EdidV2YtM3L dK3d7/v4ddUez+qDO5xEfm4LWPGAiUe9t1juI5tH5jbZFRQZA+J8udjpfnIB7yy29Awd cMfkNop64+mR+lZN9rwWIndvm1u7pyujyBRplxGpJNVXeYgazwBndOTe1yZSHhS93G0Q ozzxECuqRfrjvSsIu2lG1SxvEGpUyL6g3EbAFdahlR53sykXsw6yQSihrhQBVSf+SBzz QjZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=WhU8hFXq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s18si8196296ejr.128.2020.10.26.14.34.23; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:34:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=WhU8hFXq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1786326AbgJZQqU (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:46:20 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:55454 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1780212AbgJZQpz (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:45:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603730753; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EtQ7ATZf42jwj5zA9pcp/oVxiJsLAJssQKkbBhG+zyg=; b=WhU8hFXq6r60r7p6nPa0werS3FQw2gn8ny1eL5ecfRnW2dV/Q35dyUgG5SLu4pMwg9yVza /TOtR2bzd6zTZWIzDJeExl50eDnFwiAbctyzZI7c4Z4vamjfOvdEjhmbj3HQ/WxB29+/YT rgQrCmbIhLPoLe3IX0N0bOrVEiSpJQU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-437-N3pw_MRnMBKF2Of_PM6O7A-1; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:45:49 -0400 X-MC-Unique: N3pw_MRnMBKF2Of_PM6O7A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC861879526; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-114-87.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.87]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495D65C1BB; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:45:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Dave Martin via Libc-alpha Cc: Jeremy Linton , Dave Martin , Mark Rutland , systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Kees Cook , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Brown , toiwoton@gmail.com, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: BTI interaction between seccomp filters in systemd and glibc mprotect calls, causing service failures References: <8584c14f-5c28-9d70-c054-7c78127d84ea@arm.com> <20201026162410.GB27285@arm.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:45:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20201026162410.GB27285@arm.com> (Dave Martin via Libc-alpha's message of "Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:24:11 +0000") Message-ID: <87r1pl9brd.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Dave Martin via Libc-alpha: > Would it now help to add something like: > > int mchangeprot(void *addr, size_t len, int old_flags, int new_flags) > { > int ret = -EINVAL; > mmap_write_lock(current->mm); > if (all vmas in [addr .. addr + len) have > their mprotect flags set to old_flags) { > > ret = mprotect(addr, len, new_flags); > } > > mmap_write_unlock(current->mm); > return ret; > } I suggested something similar as well. Ideally, the interface would subsume pkey_mprotect, though, and have a separate flags argument from the protection flags. But then we run into argument list length limits. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill