Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965034AbWHNXCv (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:02:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965035AbWHNXCu (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:02:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:10411 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965034AbWHNXCu (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:02:50 -0400 Message-ID: <44E1010D.7050704@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:02:37 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Macintosh/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] fix ext3 mounts at 16T References: <44DD00FA.5060600@redhat.com> <20060814155801.fa087b24.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060814155801.fa087b24.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 851 Lines: 25 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:13:14 -0500 > Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> (a similar patch could be done for ext2; does anyone in their right mind use ext2 at 16T? > > well, a bug's a bug. People might want to ue 16TB ext2 for comparative > performance testing, or because they get their jollies from running fsck or > something. ext2 and ext3 have seemingly already diverged a bit, but I suppose no reason to let it go further. >> I'll send an ext2 patch doing the same thing if that's warranted) > > please, when you have nothing better to do ;) Will do :) -Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/