Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9e8c:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y12csp1317303pxx; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:42:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyN74OmK1058UysBzIbxwKCDZ21QK2x95SVySqfUjZapC3F3+1yCNmmPfta3zh9BDaID5Xc X-Received: by 2002:a50:c01e:: with SMTP id r30mr4133248edb.176.1603831373472; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:42:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603831373; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QlXH3DFs/rgDIkir3JNvsaAT7DOKDs3csbFzOBzChlViYpDuEagcL8TQH3Gf/n+w1O J3CNfqrKodqxuNpbHfqjjHkeSSPJACtNMj+VUXCDQs94AOjgsZB2z8doJBB1fXdUcMAV +vO+GuSixrPYM175l32G6eu9cgEsaNR42sDO4PNS/Npgr5wdKqyas9MvrpWt1Jo6x5nX TYyUWkkV7/pN/VwsVDJLId30IcoRYVJQ82xGilUhO7XSkyqrpAh6QOkP7gqS/5kONK8h MpXsU72zaB+dzTlrydXkjiF7C9N7qF//whQbu+OAY/ddZn/w7uYwhBIhH3kK3f9L+wXL lazA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=wIoj57BcsoPpujKFq3vfXtzGvYgvFnfTWIno155M9h8=; b=CiM5QPmb9+yJWHkfL8NPsvQpkJdbexTLglDdiFz7UmgQpzV7RzQuXGoEajbiWZuKZr vk3QijLbhc9VcZusY9R45aA3FYZq5w0onkUR3K4k+TKIYl6eibofE3MxzCfX4B0EVLvT BtGwaoaJL9eYszNTJRY7+hIsP8aPzinPTnD309ZfnJOj51ixKydxyEVgrPXsSa5erzay aQDd6bY52173k5V49kyMSzGfszFLuZiJfg1T3s2F4wkAKKbCxPuHODFnp3NNAsDJYEYN 5v5V/h0r1vcWoZdos4YZ/pZbjijtWBSKfcmnOu1YonCBUXBrAM1bvVsr2R7owbiolAwG W2Vg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=1tbF4E3Z; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n15si1878189edw.94.2020.10.27.13.42.31; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:42:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=1tbF4E3Z; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2505082AbgJ0DdO (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 23:33:14 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33178 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2505075AbgJ0DdO (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 23:33:14 -0400 Received: from google.com (unknown [104.132.1.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30958207BB; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:33:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603769593; bh=w3nV6GmxCOxumbgDFH2pzgztdrAxddsrvkMRDXtLytE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=1tbF4E3ZrVX/Z/MLqNmtkQEb/fPAC5xe4oJWly7Z5AM6MPYOddfFlgxXiMHwlgVdi FwkGO6a4oGgrs8+YYLUjVa+bnSKBH4XptmwX4o2yBnT+UVW+ogmucdHNFO9iJkGiq5 qo1zVtbD3qP0ia29QsdysnMhgbB9lxxYDV1YXlsA= Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 20:33:11 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Can Guo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, bvanassche@acm.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] scsi: ufs: atomic update for clkgating_enable Message-ID: <20201027033311.GA1745317@google.com> References: <20201026195124.363096-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20201026195124.363096-2-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20d1c2ca06e95beb207fd4ba1b61dc80@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20d1c2ca06e95beb207fd4ba1b61dc80@codeaurora.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/27, Can Guo wrote: > On 2020-10-27 03:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > From: Jaegeuk Kim > > > > When giving a stress test which enables/disables clkgating, we hit > > device > > timeout sometimes. This patch avoids subtle racy condition to address > > it. > > > > Note that, this requires a patch to address the device stuck by > > REQ_CLKS_OFF in > > __ufshcd_release(). > > > > The fix is "scsi: ufs: avoid to call REQ_CLKS_OFF to CLKS_OFF". > > Why don't you just squash the fix into this one? I'm seeing this patch just revealed that problem. > > Thanks, > > Can Guo. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim > > --- > > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 12 ++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > index cc8d5f0c3fdc..6c9269bffcbd 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > @@ -1808,19 +1808,19 @@ static ssize_t > > ufshcd_clkgate_enable_store(struct device *dev, > > return -EINVAL; > > > > value = !!value; > > + > > + spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > > if (value == hba->clk_gating.is_enabled) > > goto out; > > > > - if (value) { > > - ufshcd_release(hba); > > - } else { > > - spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > > + if (value) > > + __ufshcd_release(hba); > > + else > > hba->clk_gating.active_reqs++; > > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > > - } > > > > hba->clk_gating.is_enabled = value; > > out: > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > > return count; > > }