Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9e8c:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y12csp149351pxx; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:43:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzXJQrIB5EE+SG9aSey9mKGPkiRZT5as7aw0iAuKrDBUKjwjZ5nBvGNkCd5O6OU7jYmS6y X-Received: by 2002:a50:99cd:: with SMTP id n13mr6465438edb.10.1603870986240; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:43:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603870986; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Jw1ZZLJaP34McbSReaRpAijkqjW7P4klW4ZzMiqjWOxqoSRsLWyQMCp5B0JSxYtQnC RYEm68dF9HExLyseqZfXxAlWNJBlBzpB2NWzcjoLiBgENbvuusqtnXEs4ZFnSi66CCu8 Fv1Py01k2+HxGOV0Z5c8zabk5dlRSEQN6lBty5uEDrhhl7/83HfmpnTxpKnCTrSh05eX 0i7SIjeUSycIzEFkG8dDyyH85laPS4OkbjDOEMxMSq9N90QWUJFD7dCW9Vy9gyp5JS50 bT69K3Y58dcEkstQkkzMpJWgAbxmtG43lIJl63D74bCStTcBoL7e8JdcWjC0u8MPFtOW +stw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=eXXpUz3VnsL2Xy70mrZp5D4eUU9pHEsl4U/A+ZeUZVA=; b=MG9PUnh/pJ9c6EMH2Lp/x8TIXpP8OzrlgaKKWVHstJsDgKZYTXz7jzu3Cj6juIkhmK U2N/E7zU/rhhAPTpRi7hCkNwyD/7zZtzFOT+jcjloBaAJOpvu36dL1vnGcVrd2LqTu+Q KRqzZX1S6eqvYAYwcKeFLZxmCxMjrAjEpiCdGSFmp9vRsx+3HODEik9nQU0p5EBPFanU dtEN5nDM8I5hwb3jIFH65dsbVFKpSTblYYuf7Zm7Njnf4vRf2Re7qmiYMNtfnZDNi3NJ MiyiQGzkSn4ZcfT6c7WhEgdOpngO2NMYFXeILamDtDPUf7iEwIBEcLuFuFuJ/vkLC4pp uJOQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=JtzFUvgD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m17si2679881edf.309.2020.10.28.00.42.44; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=JtzFUvgD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751673AbgJ0NEV (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:04:21 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:24897 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2441196AbgJ0NEU (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:04:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603803859; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eXXpUz3VnsL2Xy70mrZp5D4eUU9pHEsl4U/A+ZeUZVA=; b=JtzFUvgD/7PMTyTnmFOLk2ht294hO5sX5SC4obWhVytheCAvFBdaWTW3bMgZ+j6wtIx0Ex EqpE2HLPajy9Yc3iEwvAzQ25WXexKMYywtqsZs8ytruWa7eDGzLSs9I2SmNc9FI6NEsoGC K/+3E4A80KJkzuzV9n7DjjO/McTl6vI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-556-6ACk6zq5PEK2TZ_Z7S-pwA-1; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:04:15 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 6ACk6zq5PEK2TZ_Z7S-pwA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D744FEC505; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.112.194] (ovpn-112-194.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.194]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3446F5B4A4; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi , yuzenghui , "eric.auger.pro@gmail.com" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "joro@8bytes.org" , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , "jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com" , "yi.l.liu@intel.com" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" References: <20200320161911.27494-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20200320161911.27494-2-eric.auger@redhat.com> <2fba23af-9cd7-147d-6202-01c13fff92e5@huawei.com> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:04:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Shameer, On 10/27/20 1:20 PM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > Hi Eric, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: iommu [mailto:iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of >> Auger Eric >> Sent: 23 September 2020 12:47 >> To: yuzenghui ; eric.auger.pro@gmail.com; >> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >> kvm@vger.kernel.org; kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; joro@8bytes.org; >> alex.williamson@redhat.com; jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com; >> yi.l.liu@intel.com; robin.murphy@arm.com >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE > > ... > >>> Besides, before going through the whole series [1][2], I'd like to >>> know if this is the latest version of your Nested-Stage-Setup work in >>> case I had missed something. >>> >>> [1] >>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200320161911.27494-1-eric.auger@redhat.com >>> [2] >>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200414150607.28488-1-eric.auger@redhat.com >> >> yes those 2 series are the last ones. Thank you for reviewing. >> >> FYI, I intend to respin within a week or 2 on top of Jacob's [PATCH v10 0/7] >> IOMMU user API enhancement. > > Thanks for that. Also is there any plan to respin the related Qemu series as well? > I know dual stage interface proposals are still under discussion, but it would be > nice to have a testable solution based on new interfaces for ARM64 as well. > Happy to help with any tests or verifications. Yes the QEMU series will be respinned as well. That's on the top of my todo list right now. Thanks Eric > > Please let me know. > > Thanks, > Shameer > >