Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030382AbWHOR6N (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:58:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030408AbWHOR6N (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:58:13 -0400 Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.36]:51629 "HELO smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1030382AbWHOR6M (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:58:12 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.it; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=EzwVWsFO88U3P+jyCPsrnfC4z5QCFvN4+eWf/ANKYs3lQZqG6dlNr258qSE/gbr5xAGlg9/tzKYsvZnDAxtLad27kqBeXYYSvatQBwAkMsXsBrwBkpGYypcEmdE+7EEIU0YGIpKcmibIjczTd6cVQZ8vMMBe8/BtvL5rs4rBHVI= ; From: Blaisorblade To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML - support checkstack Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:57:59 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Jeff Dike , Matt Mackall , akpm@osdl.org, Joern Engel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200608091815.k79IFQVB005310@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060810164548.GS6908@waste.org> <20060815031733.GA7089@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20060815031733.GA7089@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608151957.59759.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1338 Lines: 32 On Tuesday 15 August 2006 05:17, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:45:48AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > > > SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying, > > > host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager. > > > > Right, so it sounds like this breaks Voyager. Which I think means we > > ought to pass ARCH and SUBARCH and do the right thing inside > > checkstack. > > There is no use of the symbol SUBARCH in arch/i386. While this may be > jarring to people who know and love Voyager, it doesn't break > anything. > > We could do what you suggest, but that sounds unnecessary. > > I'd rather either > leave things as they are Yes, and make the script check if it ARCH=um or not (which is obvious for now - nobody really wants a clear abstraction here). > rename SUBARCH -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/