Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965115AbWHOStj (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:49:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965121AbWHOStj (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:49:39 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:21263 "EHLO 1wt.eu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965115AbWHOSti (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:49:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:45:12 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: alex@yuriev.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: How to find a sick router with 2.6.17+ and tcp_window_scaling enabled Message-ID: <20060815184512.GB6672@1wt.eu> References: <44E1F0CD.7000003@everytruckjob.com> <20060815180634.GB15957@s2.yuriev.com> <20060815181938.GK8776@1wt.eu> <20060815183300.GC15957@s2.yuriev.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060815183300.GC15957@s2.yuriev.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1488 Lines: 37 On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 02:33:00PM -0400, alex@yuriev.com wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 08:19:39PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > This is absolutely not correct. Routers forward packets. They do not mangle > > > the data in them. > > > > Believe it or not, there are a lot of routers nowadays that can do NAT. > > And even for very basic NAT, you have to recompute the TCP checksum, which > > means that you mangle data within the packet. Even worse, some of them are > > able to NAT complex protocols such as FTP and for this, they need to mangle > > the application payload. OK, this should not be the router's job, but it's > > often the best placed to do the job, and there is customer demand for this. > > Just because you are using a Linksys/Netgear or god else knows what to > mangle your packets and call that device a router That's not what I call a router ! > does not mean that normal service providers have NAT enabled on > their GSRs and Junipers. not on the PE, but offen on the CE. > The issue is not in a router running IOS somewhere. The issue is in the > broken code/broken driver/broken something on the end-point. He may very well have an IOS based 1600 or equivalent doing a very dirty NAT. > Alex Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/