Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9e8c:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y12csp316684pxx; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 03:27:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9GqW1zHydKyT2C0M3yw2yxTc0C/vA0ZsoOeaSrrYA38yvk3JatV7E1iHdFhrzzx/zEOSC X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c141:: with SMTP id r1mr3209720edp.297.1603967276976; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 03:27:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603967276; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sdCImXEMnsGCtmurb4u67ouAT1BmpYk0mfoqclLq1JurlX8gfnAtmdVaxWYcAoeztP 0aPyrvPUJeZWSbLoiox+xsr0oloemMdQCXsn02Bd6mfJDPik+/nwqXSoW7BLNMnhthX4 SezbMNSCm2JuFn18xeWj+hoOZewiFs4Uqsc1kNw5HPAlCmho7996QXbMZkxr/TL7epvk NFcl936RS4uulMMpAsAekPbdRgEvY8gmSEveiBrmMYkz3VUmAtDsxdqEp+zQGkshCxEk 71XyeNLfrPZIRuiSfwO9Yn/bya6uOkDAXLaBH7P7219jvNj2aY+KH8yzfvvMiLghZmrs QvkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:message-id:from:cc:to:subject :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :user-agent:date:dkim-signature:ai-spam-status:dkim-signature; bh=KfUVcHBin0OBd+RZlLa24TEOQcGJd2MK1AGrnvy4kMA=; b=rCyrxsKuxnmMI7dmA+3iZ2X5gsIIRgYFWyUFP4sN4V9ABe8BjYtJRzMcYwsaA2pB4E m6SyREA5qKvsHk/K9egVD8hDmB/fmrtceON/dz2QZX0orwimB+rIB2YuwrEp8nmdiVpc CYojuJkVBDhqX/6Kf4nFI5uj3LMWyuf8UWF+SvQnI10V1oIbqaZU3lhL6yJjYlrm2xyb v9I9gotly9T+iSh0E5rF7+a8qgwS6ILi1RsttE1EL8BkMKDP9KIPSJ9DcTM7NRrOjmGE ZdedwcRvqVmLkEuiu6QH8uXGRxVWDIKttE7916ica9DVHtPhNoaLcXsQDHjv8Y+UJwHa pkgQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mymailcheap.com header.s=default header.b=F8uPFAWM; dkim=fail header.i=@aosc.io header.s=default header.b=civFcXEp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a16si1683299ejk.22.2020.10.29.03.27.32; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 03:27:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mymailcheap.com header.s=default header.b=F8uPFAWM; dkim=fail header.i=@aosc.io header.s=default header.b=civFcXEp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726323AbgJ2KY7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:24:59 -0400 Received: from relay5.mymailcheap.com ([159.100.248.207]:37593 "EHLO relay5.mymailcheap.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726145AbgJ2KY7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:24:59 -0400 Received: from relay2.mymailcheap.com (relay2.mymailcheap.com [151.80.165.199]) by relay5.mymailcheap.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78A6B260EB for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter1.mymailcheap.com (filter1.mymailcheap.com [149.56.130.247]) by relay2.mymailcheap.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 186903ECDA; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:24:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filter1.mymailcheap.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570452A0F9; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:24:53 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mymailcheap.com; s=default; t=1603967093; bh=4swhytK2zsubih5GZHoRetLtnB5qvjMkgDk1gv1OedQ=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:CC:From:From; b=F8uPFAWMCQh3vgTbD0UmiYLgDfzXwAknKrxShCCkfsdHFSQav5B1AZJCDeila32BT vT5oExYFHmddeBLLZxt0k5jdZ0Xe62zNvGQFwzIc0h5Sx4O/USh/C6gjF7qdTkisS0 0vtScpdhkH/4ByLEdz4/X+sLNtKRAAJsgjqZRmug= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at filter1.mymailcheap.com Received: from filter1.mymailcheap.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (filter1.mymailcheap.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iiyFK8Joi_7B; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:24:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail20.mymailcheap.com (mail20.mymailcheap.com [51.83.111.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by filter1.mymailcheap.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:24:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [213.133.102.83] (ml.mymailcheap.com [213.133.102.83]) by mail20.mymailcheap.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4B640B5A; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail20.mymailcheap.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=aosc.io header.i=@aosc.io header.b="civFcXEp"; dkim-atps=neutral AI-Spam-Status: Not processed Received: from [172.19.0.1] (unknown [64.225.114.122]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail20.mymailcheap.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D731940B4D; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:24:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=aosc.io; s=default; t=1603967082; bh=4swhytK2zsubih5GZHoRetLtnB5qvjMkgDk1gv1OedQ=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:CC:From:From; b=civFcXEpvuF+IJPSRAkyisaBLrx0SMEMb9huNRDka7dahtOVEcmYUpZGWhqYVmySR 9thlYkTqzUEAVBHEwjJeks/MiYpXXA26EwrcetKCIH49j33V1aSxZKRfw+KwKXs9cv K5FURPKfzvcNhA5jxBpc/7BSfkBagDhk+s8fUrzk= Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:24:34 +0800 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20201029101304.yja4m747pc62re34@gilmour.lan> References: <20201029022000.601913-1-matteo.scordino@gmail.com> <20201029022000.601913-5-matteo.scordino@gmail.com> <20201029101304.yja4m747pc62re34@gilmour.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: add Elimo bindings To: Maxime Ripard , Matteo Scordino CC: wens@csie.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Kocialkowski From: Icenowy Zheng Message-ID: <92612D42-FF4C-450C-ADB1-A220B94838CB@aosc.io> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1C4B640B5A X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.40 / 10.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(0.00)[aosc.io:s=default]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[dt]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[aosc.io]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; ML_SERVERS(-3.10)[213.133.102.83]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[aosc.io:+]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[cerno.tech,gmail.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.133.96.0/19, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; HFILTER_HELO_BAREIP(3.00)[213.133.102.83,1] X-Rspamd-Server: mail20.mymailcheap.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org =E4=BA=8E 2020=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8829=E6=97=A5 GMT+08:00 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=88= 6:13:04, Maxime Ripard =E5=86=99=E5=88=B0: >Hi, > >On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:19:59AM +0000, Matteo Scordino wrote: >> Document board compatible names for Elimo Engineering Impetus and >Initium >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Matteo Scordino >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi=2Eyaml | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >>=20 >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi=2Eyaml >b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi=2Eyaml >> index 0f23133672a3=2E=2E55405809ec91 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi=2Eyaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi=2Eyaml >> @@ -898,3 +898,13 @@ properties: >> items: >> - const: xunlong,orangepi-zero-plus2-h3 >> - const: allwinner,sun8i-h3 >> + >> + - description: Elimo Engineering Impetus SoM >> + items: >> + - const: elimo,impetus >> + - const: allwinner,sun8i-s3 >> + >> + - description: Elimo Engineering Initium >> + items: >> + - const: elimo,initium >> + - const: allwinner,sun8i-s3 > >This should be ordered alphabetically, and most importantly, must match >the ones you have in the DT=2E > >Here, we have kind of a mess already: the Lichee Zero+ uses >,sipeed,lichee-zero-plus, sochip,s3, allwinner,sun8i-v3, while the >pinecube uses pine64,pinecube, allwinner,sun8i-s3 > >IIRC the S3 and V3 are pretty much the same SoCs, so the first one >seems >to make more sense to me, but then we should fix the pinecube=2E I agree with this=2E PineCube is originally designed for S3L (which is branded under Allwinner) but switch to S3 finally, so I may made error when adapting=2E > >Maxime