Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
        xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
        "open list\:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] x86: apic: avoid -Wshadow warning in header
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0e0YAkh_9S1ZG5FW3QozZnp1CwXUfWx9VHWkY=h+FVxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:52:22 +0100
Message-ID: <871rhhotyx.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Arnd,

On Thu, Oct 29 2020 at 10:51, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:04 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 28/10/20 22:20, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > Avoid this by renaming the global 'apic' variable to the more descriptive
>> > 'x86_system_apic'. It was originally called 'genapic', but both that
>> > and the current 'apic' seem to be a little overly generic for a global
>> > variable.
>>
>> The 'apic' affects only the current CPU, so one of 'x86_local_apic',
>> 'x86_lapic' or 'x86_apic' is probably preferrable.
>
> Ok, I'll change it to x86_local_apic then, unless someone else has
> a preference between them.

x86_local_apic is fine with me.

> I think ideally there would be no global variable, withall accesses
> encapsulated in function calls, possibly using static_call() optimizations
> if any of them are performance critical.

There are a bunch, yes.

> It doesn't seem hard to do, but I'd rather leave that change to
> an x86 person ;-)

It's not hard, but I'm not really sure whether it buys much.

Can you please redo that against tip x86/apic. Much of what you are
touching got a major overhaul.

Thanks,

        tglx