Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751202AbWHPPDT (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:03:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751209AbWHPPDS (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:03:18 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:19397 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751202AbWHPPDS (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:03:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:03:14 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com Cc: linux kernel mailing list , "Eric W. Biederman" , Fastboot mailing list , Don Zickus Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Re-positioning the bss segment Message-Id: <20060816170314.f16f8afa.ak@muc.de> In-Reply-To: <20060815214952.GB11719@in.ibm.com> References: <20060815214952.GB11719@in.ibm.com> Organization: unorganized X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1527 Lines: 40 On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:49:52 -0400 Vivek Goyal wrote: > > o Currently bss segment is being placed somewhere in the middle (after .data) > section and after bss lots of init section and data sections are coming. > Is it intentional? Not that I know of. > > o One side affect of placing bss in the middle is that objcopy keeps the > bss in raw binary image (vmlinux.bin) hence unnecessarily increasing > the size of raw binary image. (In my case ~600K). It also increases > the size of generated bzImage, though the increase is very small > (896 bytes), probably a very high compression ratio for stream > of zeros. > > o This patch moves the bss at the end hence reducing the size of > bzImage by 896 bytes and size of vmlinux.bin by 600K. > > o This change benefits in the context of relocatable kernel patches. If > kernel bss is not part of compressed data (vmlinux.bin) then it does > not have to be decompressed and this area can be used by the decompressor > for its execution hence keeping the memory requirements bounded and > decompressor code does not stomp over any other data loaded beyond > kernel image (As might be the case with bootloaders like kexec). Merged thanks. Does i386 need a similar change? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/