Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [Build fail] i386 & nvdimm is unhappy
To:     Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
References: <87sg9wodp1.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <CAPcyv4hBSwdDocpgFh2=qbVQN=Mc+15cW4cV5m_S-SxVCYY=mA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201029230920.GA32559@intel.com>
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <d066788b-0f69-37e5-fd5c-12755f498677@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:13:16 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201029230920.GA32559@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 10/29/20 4:09 PM, Philip Li wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:52:42PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 3:44 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dan,
>>>
>>> x86 32bit build fails with the config below with this:
>>>
>>>   ERROR: modpost: "phys_to_target_node" [drivers/nvdimm/nd_e820.ko]
>>>   undefined!
>>
>> Acknowledged, I'm on it.
>>
>> Wonder how 0-day missed this or I missed the 0-day report?
> Sorry about this Dan. Can you share some info like which kconfig and bad commit?
> We will investigate this to provide update in earliest time.
> 
> Thanks
> 
>>

I posted earlier today about the same failure on x86_64 & linux-next:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/0faac4da-a7bc-3fc7-e278-ad4f72499224@infradead.org/T/#u


Thomas and I both included kernel config files.

-- 
~Randy