Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 08:11:20 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>
Cc:     outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        melissa.srw@gmail.com, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: use
 DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()
Message-ID: <20201030071120.GA1493629@kroah.com>
References: <20201030032245.GA274478@my--box>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201030032245.GA274478@my--box>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 08:52:45AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> Using DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE macro with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()
> function in place of the debugfs_create_file() function will make the
> file operation struct "reset" aware of the file's lifetime. Additional
> details here: https://lists.archive.carbon60.com/linux/kernel/2369498
> 
> Issue reported by Coccinelle script:
> scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>
> ---
> Please Note: This is a Outreachy project task patch.
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
> index 2d125b8b15ee..f076b1ba7319 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
> @@ -1551,29 +1551,29 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_sclk_set(void *data, u64 val)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(fops_ib_preempt, NULL,
> -			amdgpu_debugfs_ib_preempt, "%llu\n");
> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(fops_ib_preempt, NULL,
> +			 amdgpu_debugfs_ib_preempt, "%llu\n");

Are you sure this is ok?  Do these devices need this additional
"protection"?  Do they have the problem that these macros were written
for?

Same for the other patches you just submitted here, I think you need to
somehow "prove" that these changes are necessary, checkpatch isn't able
to determine this all the time.

thanks,

greg k-h