Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750974AbWHPROg (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:14:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750972AbWHPROf (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:14:35 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51079 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750773AbWHPROe (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:14:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:13:28 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Kirill Korotaev Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alan Cox , Ingo Molnar , Christoph Hellwig , Pavel Emelianov , Andrey Savochkin , devel@openvz.org, Rik van Riel , hugh@veritas.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] UBC: proc interface Message-ID: <20060816171328.GA27898@kroah.com> References: <44E33893.6020700@sw.ru> <44E33D5E.7000205@sw.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44E33D5E.7000205@sw.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 689 Lines: 18 On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:44:30PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > Add proc interface (/proc/user_beancounters) allowing to see current > state (usage/limits/fails for each UB). Implemented via seq files. Ugh, why /proc? This doesn't have anything to do with processes, just users, right? What's wrong with /sys/kernel/ instead? Or /sys/kernel/debug/user_beancounters/ in debugfs as this is just a debugging thing, right? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/