Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201014231158.34117-1-warthog618@gmail.com> <CACRpkdbTsN6p4n3f9SJrgAjdkzDu2S67rU3tLWwX0X50ekjctQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201028232211.GB4384@sol> <CAMpxmJX61dRE_d2Eyu2nXKx64rNrrTfScrdg=Cc-N-R_FKfUNg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMpxmJX61dRE_d2Eyu2nXKx64rNrrTfScrdg=Cc-N-R_FKfUNg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:52:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJXiObcKyoE264oyiZOs08=uRYno6siMzz6BH+jmT_NKgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] gpiolib: cdev: allow edge event timestamps to be
 configured as REALTIME
To:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 3:49 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:22 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 05:01:49PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 1:12 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patch set adds the option to select CLOCK_REALTIME as the source
> > > > clock for line events.
> > > >
> > > > The first patch is the core of the change, while the remaining two update
> > > > the GPIO tools to make use of the new option.
> > > >
> > > > Changes for v2:
> > > >  - change line_event_timestamp() return to u64 to avoid clipping to 32bits
> > > >    on 32bit platforms.
> > > >  - fix the line spacing after line_event_timestamp()
> > >
> > > Where are we standing with this patch set? Good to go so
> > > I should just try to merge it?
> > >
> >
> > I'm fine with it, especially now that I've tested it on 32bit platforms
> > as well as 64bit.
> >
> > Bart was ok with v1, and I doubt the changes for v2 would negatively
> > impact that, though I did overlook adding his review tag.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Kent.
> >
> > > Yours,
> > > Linus Walleij
>
> I'll take it through my tree then.
>
> Bartosz

The series no longer applies on top of v5.10-rc1. Could you rebase and resend?

Bartosz