Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9e8c:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y12csp1526117pxx; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:04:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwgztXI7tSK+n8JoJU+r0Degmu7cxcV4FHzkRi/Nur0zv9H+BgFDUoksvDS+pAR4ARJg6Zf X-Received: by 2002:a50:dac1:: with SMTP id s1mr4074065edj.74.1604084673917; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:04:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1604084673; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jbObceexRZNjAgeEQddrcNpoPQAoxp1BWlL15iejybDEBaOuUOPnT+vWhrr929lvTy HjleW9pLJIbTtlCjn2W3x7H8OupQcwhnXUQq9D6E+6n/m0/NKihj25p9RvUfSOwUVkLn S3SXWf/D6jbYRnOP0IlrRj1IoDnZMN6pMyZouv8r9LTPy1glTyTcG1Djse+HmVXx0c95 sp1OMydpEy3Bzu2WW/BhQ6smTW8PEeiEvuNPrRUB0572+Ia7CSTp4Ao/MmlZ7o0Ka7z1 wZ46P3AzrJ2LqFC49PUvrqmJBfRHNyehF3xiGFAOrLbGRQDuh0REGT9XmZa42353cKK8 xYQA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=mrJT80F/5HA0sjpli4V7Mximdk60qerJdHwLHREvqg0=; b=fhLeh9Ltiad7/+55Z7ehm9IkzlVDg8f6qiLWOOa/mA4vpvdvsLHR5lsPFt7hgFYWPy IBxcfvb8ETKTu9brDvDBdN8aeNSxos9ra4JzH8yt56H8zExGZppMUB/jnjMAsnJ+5HlR 1xgbaAhR9x0AHvNgzqZDmr5ZlU4f8qxvbMd30EVHXBxIBIoOa6XRFiXOZDLJVcDoqEr6 lVL0I881MAX1yBm8Y4nLM5rWm1phAm40pUW50Nfpz8TLjfVz62IrRA27x8mBmHGw15l7 5YJm/xggaMmKL1IPiMDLU00GEns/Z8rzizfWSV8MwLhp23GOX8IC8L17B+ViWb7M8Oi3 LvyA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k24si5080222eds.187.2020.10.30.12.04.10; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727311AbgJ3TCo (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:02:44 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:30179 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727137AbgJ3TCo (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:02:44 -0400 IronPort-SDR: 67tiijuv0G82A7mnVlotQyRunYz4XRi8W+SEIYyhtiZNx8uFOob4O23CYEGXUTetNcz8x2eUyL Z5R/Ej2OCuBg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9790"; a="165154803" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,434,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="165154803" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Oct 2020 12:02:43 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 5YXUIAQv+McZhxTjcsBckey+vREkkHnN2xde3eKCPu6HB0BAma7fFwgOc9E23f46Aa+5yKFBMI tPe1edzpuM+Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,434,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="537167643" Received: from kingelix-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO bwidawsk-mobl5.local) ([10.252.139.120]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Oct 2020 12:02:43 -0700 From: Ben Widawsky To: linux-mm , Andrew Morton Cc: Ben Widawsky , Dave Hansen , Michal Hocko , Michal Hocko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 01/12] mm/mempolicy: Add comment for missing LOCAL Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:02:27 -0700 Message-Id: <20201030190238.306764-2-ben.widawsky@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20201030190238.306764-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com> References: <20201030190238.306764-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MPOL_LOCAL is a bit weird because it is simply a different name for an existing behavior (preferred policy with no node mask). It has been this way since it was added here: commit 479e2802d09f ("mm: mempolicy: Make MPOL_LOCAL a real policy") It is so similar to MPOL_PREFERRED in fact that when the policy is created in mpol_new, the mode is set as PREFERRED, and an internal state representing LOCAL doesn't exist. To prevent future explorers from scratching their head as to why MPOL_LOCAL isn't defined in the mpol_ops table, add a small comment explaining the situations. v2: Change comment to refer to mpol_new (Michal) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200630212517.308045-2-ben.widawsky@intel.com Acked-by: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky --- mm/mempolicy.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c index 3fde772ef5ef..e24f0133ff1f 100644 --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ static const struct mempolicy_operations mpol_ops[MPOL_MAX] = { .create = mpol_new_bind, .rebind = mpol_rebind_nodemask, }, + /* [MPOL_LOCAL] - see mpol_new() */ }; static int migrate_page_add(struct page *page, struct list_head *pagelist, -- 2.29.2