Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932067AbWHQGtf (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:49:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932073AbWHQGtf (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:49:35 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:61351 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932067AbWHQGte (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:49:34 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.34-pre1 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Adrian Bunk , Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, Mikael Pettersson In-Reply-To: <20060817051616.GB13878@1wt.eu> References: <20060816223633.GA3421@hera.kernel.org> <20060816235459.GM7813@stusta.de> <20060817051616.GB13878@1wt.eu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:48:51 +0200 Message-Id: <1155797331.4494.17.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1529 Lines: 33 > Right now, I'd prefer getting gcc 4 support than gcc 3.4, because I don't > know if even one common distro has shipped with gcc 3.4 by default. 2.95, > 3.0, and 3.3 have been common, and right now, 4.[01] is almost everywhere. but most distros that ship with gcc 4 aren't capable of running a 2.4 kernel.... all the new distros greatly depend on sysfs for example, and ntpl in glibc requires 2.6 etc etc etc. So I'm rather sceptical about this argument. > > > Since there shouldn't be any reason for still using a 2.4 kernel > > except for "never change a running system", > > I think that by "never change", you meant "except for regular updates". I think that you'll find that people who run 2.4 today, if you ask them, will say "please change as little as possible, only serious bugs and security issues". After all the people who run 2.4 still are generally those who resist new stuff in favor of stability of existing systems.... But maybe it's worth doing a user survey to find out what the users of 2.4 want... (and with that I mean users of the kernel.org 2.4 kernels, people who use enterprise distro kernels don't count for this since they'll not go to a newer released 2.4 anyway) -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/