Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932217AbWHQI7a (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:59:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932334AbWHQI7a (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:59:30 -0400 Received: from aun.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.36]:36514 "EHLO aun.it.uu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932217AbWHQI73 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:59:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17636.11747.89849.992490@alkaid.it.uu.se> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:50:43 +0200 From: Mikael Pettersson To: Andreas Steinmetz Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Willy Tarreau , Adrian Bunk , Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, Mikael Pettersson Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.34-pre1 In-Reply-To: <44E42A4C.4040100@domdv.de> References: <20060816223633.GA3421@hera.kernel.org> <20060816235459.GM7813@stusta.de> <20060817051616.GB13878@1wt.eu> <1155797331.4494.17.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <44E42A4C.4040100@domdv.de> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under Emacs 20.7.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1411 Lines: 27 Andreas Steinmetz writes: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > But maybe it's worth doing a user survey to find out what the users of > > 2.4 want... (and with that I mean users of the kernel.org 2.4 kernels, > > people who use enterprise distro kernels don't count for this since > > they'll not go to a newer released 2.4 anyway) > > Currently I'm working with ARM based embedded systems. I prefer 2.4 > kernels to 2.6 as they are smaller thus leaving more flash for jffs2. > Not speaking of the kernel a gcc 4.1.1 compile of code for a LPC2103 > resulted in a clearly smaller binary as the same compile with gcc 3.4. > Thus I really would like to be able to use gcc 4.x with 2.4 kernels. > There are even kernel miscompiles with gcc 3.4 that might be fixed with > gcc 4 (one has to try). I've done a fair amount of ARM user-space hacking recently, and the number of bug fixes one has to apply to gcc-3.3 or gcc-3.4 to make it even semi-correct on ARM is scary. Since these versions aren't supported any more, being able to use newer, hopefully less buggy, and _supported_ gcc versions is clearly beneficial. Of course, this is not an issue for x86 users. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/