Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9e8c:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y12csp3146380pxx; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 00:51:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGqFfPd/rrtmwxwtK+X/BhKd2L1l8/h6pFyhwQcCyWMz1o0dVWvi/96DTrcmOVj21x9FAj X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:180b:: with SMTP id v11mr1839731eje.466.1604307067185; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:51:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1604307067; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DSxbjJ0t+MAeTTilzdlnngG90nKvvM3ChrmI1fFXs/bWQO6N9NOqdBOHQzDx+sAMcc 5GUkup559DJa6TqC0qQZ7rp3ej1zkIGXDkS2kMmM4zoGzVF3J8R/mNGkE83bDiP02I3B igIulsboWXbnhdyp97vZOgIy1idCkZ656qtWnVYyjMoifeKTbtnw4Jt1Xzuc5fSEz4/i k6j3C3wuo9wn8e5kEFTUvEr3R6eH0ZdIhg1hO6T9oaQr5j0Gmv6Wf4Ym5gy04SKz6XtC CKhcP05G74TZ6NwEWDJxDtIUtSCA74jB8J2mbYzPJTKfIRgF5JbD5ULgni4+uZRyFBLg 9nfg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:to:subject; bh=mIMRhVNgv/i0cXy9xu6ugwWcgSuFeSm+AjggO4c8pRg=; b=BqMuwDX1darnErTsIw6kuupuPmV7uQKO0t3sNAs018UB2A5gmMmo8lMwGtzTtCKUGO WcXyaWB/lWe9ZWmnr9OvLU5/7RfOIb4L1VBUsuOpaEYNkfWW4GuFSl3A+XZ58GohmMel uDQ8M7YjBfXJ+wYVoxX1di9xWsIEtRMkfiiISr50psxcjCZAFOPkR2SP/DrXMwgBU/e2 UGK2ul+L7yqwvwJDZYFNPocXRSPM/Eu6cBugX6Dzb3WvmB0Dl0kKFb4C2tCS2HkZi7Og k2KnQ/ow/IwXu7VPLTICn7F7n3CVeZinNKLBSZr+jm7O0zwK4UYgi1nfYRTS0tAmyy+g 6jEQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r12si9679471ejr.690.2020.11.02.00.50.43; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:51:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728210AbgKBIrM (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Nov 2020 03:47:12 -0500 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:6689 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727902AbgKBIrM (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2020 03:47:12 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CPmkK15Jgz15PVx; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 16:47:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.57.60.129) by DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 16:46:58 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/hisilicon: Remove redundant null check To: Thomas Zimmermann , Tian Tao , , , , , , , , References: <1604050046-64539-1-git-send-email-tiantao6@hisilicon.com> <2dbbbad0-53cf-52cc-3b6b-0d1547f7e085@suse.de> From: "tiantao (H)" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 16:46:48 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2dbbbad0-53cf-52cc-3b6b-0d1547f7e085@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.57.60.129] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 在 2020/11/2 16:32, Thomas Zimmermann 写道: > Hi > > Am 30.10.20 um 10:27 schrieb Tian Tao: >> drm_irq_uninstall can handle the case where dev->irq_enable is false, >> so Remove redundant null check. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c >> index 0c1b40d..b71589b1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c >> @@ -246,13 +246,13 @@ static int hibmc_unload(struct drm_device *dev) >> >> drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(dev); >> >> - if (dev->irq_enabled) >> - drm_irq_uninstall(dev); >> - >> + drm_irq_uninstall(dev); > > Removing this check would at least result in an error, [1] so rather > leave it in for now. > Now there seems to be no driver to check the return value of drm_irq_uninstall > Instead, we could discuss if drm_irq_install() should become a managed > interface. Codes like the following diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c index 09d6e9e..572357c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c @@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ int drm_irq_uninstall(struct drm_device *dev) bool irq_enabled; int i; + if(!dev->irq_enabled || !dev) + return 0; > > Best regards > Thomas > > [1] > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c#L201 > >> pci_disable_msi(dev->pdev); >> + >> hibmc_kms_fini(priv); >> hibmc_mm_fini(priv); >> dev->dev_private = NULL; >> + >> return 0; >> } >> >> >