Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9e8c:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y12csp3168961pxx; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 01:38:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxpmUoqL1jfEUm++Lv0ik1s1cxGOp9K3ns1ZswonDfs+fLS7vpjc6U3Q/4oYoXCx2QDdGr X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d28a:: with SMTP id w10mr15832935edq.192.1604309932109; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 01:38:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1604309932; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ps5iLL5+DbQo4R39Pab/jKoxTcdJn1aHrBDcf/BZoWZy4TObsKrZ+VDN6kPfRhZOA/ TyNkDTeJGNm1nK5DylecQ9Zgunf07sywNpzpbN9Wid2qOm9Nq8SPpJiKspeUTb7/nc1e ffc/33ec0O9qNokB0S1UCUYc2v/2Qo6gbwRZCQoi1eqqchBp8Ci0QDRdF/XLMRyTVQhc Ztm0ghWKH3VXD659oAmLmPaacUKGpeIYCrI/LZ1TPRicEzx9tb1husoCu+GAOmKRkoX4 o8TefinoSIAD8JbERnFWE2JOIrTpZK/NGG7c1NsjP0WaT+4iYce0/pp7Mz8dOcs3CcTz O0zg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=WgCajD9RNzyf8krLl58az7wZFVFKuXsyBr3jDESoLAU=; b=PFC1oJ/5eCxT7mlCEeklbi3uVaKqqmXpOSGwNKgFGNtsLiplDb5QOlKdGX/xkrvItJ qx7fHj9jiE69bffnk4/zghgrosQWJENmewdHREyLxSMEURw5iWYxahDaS1yOegMXsIg9 EoHtJ/dy/U9Q3+LCvhOZBPQlcT9NnOw7CjTlOIOUwEuiJbp3MGYrQPo1iYFv8rqSk4ff qzIVtPJ7B5m0C4UDzNgCZQK+V/E7rA05KAZvCH8WLEcmCrnEitVGEg7icJi4ZcgGnK3o puyiPGXWevVOs1wIDTMYih8ismtpi9EnZeC90Shz/qS3IDXHwP4XbhLc/gPLA1LkR/Nj oEDA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b17si6352917edw.47.2020.11.02.01.38.27; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 01:38:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728183AbgKBJge (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Nov 2020 04:36:34 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:7572 "EHLO szxga05-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728081AbgKBJge (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2020 04:36:34 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CPnqH2VNvzLrVT; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 17:36:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.180] (10.174.176.180) by DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 17:36:25 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: tpd12s015: Fix irq registering in tpd12s015_probe To: Tomi Valkeinen , Sam Ravnborg References: <20201031031648.42368-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> <20201031071936.GA1044557@ravnborg.org> <57bfde5b-aee1-c15f-896a-63033e86d9a2@ti.com> CC: , , , , , , , , , From: Yuehaibing Message-ID: <3d7fc2b4-8f8c-2ad3-34a5-7c48a6832df0@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 17:36:25 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57bfde5b-aee1-c15f-896a-63033e86d9a2@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.176.180] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/11/2 14:57, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 31/10/2020 09:19, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> Hi YueHaibing >> >> Thanks for the fix. Appreciated but please update as per comments below. >> >> On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 11:16:48AM +0800, YueHaibing wrote: >>> gpiod_to_irq() return negative value in case of error, >>> the existing code handle negative error codes wrongly. >>> >>> Fixes: cff5e6f7e83f ("drm/bridge: Add driver for the TI TPD12S015 HDMI level shifter") >>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tpd12s015.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tpd12s015.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tpd12s015.c >>> index 514cbf0eac75..a18d5197c16c 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tpd12s015.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tpd12s015.c >>> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static int tpd12s015_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> >>> /* Register the IRQ if the HPD GPIO is IRQ-capable. */ >>> tpd->hpd_irq = gpiod_to_irq(tpd->hpd_gpio); >>> - if (tpd->hpd_irq) { >>> + if (tpd->hpd_irq > 0) { >>> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, tpd->hpd_irq, NULL, >>> tpd12s015_hpd_isr, >>> IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | >> >> The current implmentation will skip devm_request_threaded_irq() in case >> or error - but continue with the rest of the function. So the >> driver fails to return an error code. > > That is intended. If the HPD gpio supports IRQs (gpiod_to_irq returns a valid number), we use the > IRQ. If it doesn't (gpiod_to_irq returns an error), it gets polled via detect(). Both are ok. > > I don't know if the gpiod_to_irq never returning 0 is something we should rely on. The docs say > gpiod_to_irq returns the irq number or an error, so I think checking for >= 0 matches the docs better. > gpiod_to_irq() now never returns 0, see: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.10-rc2/source/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c#L3183 Also commit 4c37ce8608a8 ("gpio: make gpiod_to_irq() return negative for NO_IRQ") says: commit 4c37ce8608a8c6521726d4cd1d4f54424e8d095f Author: Linus Walleij Date: Mon May 2 13:13:10 2016 +0200 gpio: make gpiod_to_irq() return negative for NO_IRQ If a translation returns zero, that means NO_IRQ, so we should return an error since the function is documented to return a negative code on error. So checking for >0 is enough, my patch is correct. > Tomi >