Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 09:56:51 -0500
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>, fweisbec@gmail.com,
        neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] srcu: Fix invoke_rcu_callbacks() segcb length
 adjustment
Message-ID: <20201103145651.GA1304393@google.com>
References: <20201103142603.1302207-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
 <20201103142603.1302207-4-joel@joelfernandes.org>
 <20201103144714.GA432431@lothringen>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201103144714.GA432431@lothringen>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 03:47:14PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 09:25:59AM -0500, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > With earlier patches, the negative counting of the unsegmented list
> > cannot be used to adjust the segmented one. To fix this, sample the
> > unsegmented length in advance, and use it after CB execution to adjust
> > the segmented list's length.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> 
> This breaks bisection, you need to either fix up the previous patch
> by adding this diff inside or better yet: expand what you did
> in "rcu/tree: Make rcu_do_batch count how many callbacks were executed"
> to also handle srcu before introducing the segcb count.

Right, the latter is better. Let us do that.

thanks,

 - Joel