Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:17:31 +0100
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>, fweisbec@gmail.com,
        neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/7] rcu/trace: Add tracing for how segcb list changes
Message-ID: <20201103151731.GB432431@lothringen>
References: <20201103142603.1302207-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
 <20201103142603.1302207-5-joel@joelfernandes.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201103142603.1302207-5-joel@joelfernandes.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 09:26:00AM -0500, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> +/*
> + * Return how many CBs each segment along with their gp_seq values.
> + *
> + * This function is O(N) where N is the number of segments. Only used from
> + * tracing code which is usually disabled in production.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE
> +static void rcu_segcblist_countseq(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp,
> +			 int cbcount[RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS],
> +			 unsigned long gpseq[RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS])
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS; i++) {
> +		cbcount[i] = rcu_segcblist_get_seglen(rsclp, i);
> +		gpseq[i] = rsclp->gp_seq[i];
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void __trace_rcu_segcb_stats(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, const char *context)
> +{
> +	int cbs[RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS];
> +	unsigned long gps[RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS];
> +
> +	if (!trace_rcu_segcb_stats_enabled())
> +		return;

Yes, very good!

Paul just told me that RCU_TRACE can be used in production so that confirms that we
wanted to avoid this loop of 8 iterations when tracing is disabled.

Thanks.