DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=qc5AbRPbJHLAEACixmfKph4Z2mmhESOShzTF+o7PkkgokLufvK1n/EW2/+GkYw8BTE23LUeFC8Pr7MDtEoSYLcFgVzWckrA/jPXYRWL9cxurbAzUED86ZDTM2lZlE0nf4OdsAU3kMOG1ZJGTnqCHbyaFKBxHYoUbT+2mK/qX+Ko=
Message-ID: <40d80630608170758h801504boebb92563238d8b06@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 07:58:01 -0700
From: "Anonymous User" <anonymouslinuxuser@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPL Violation?
Cc: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@stusta.de>, "Patrick McFarland" <diablod3@gmail.com>,
       "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
       "Grzegorz Kulewski" <kangur@polcom.net>,
       "Stefan Richter" <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <40d80630608162248y498cb970r97a14c582fd663e1@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <40d80630608162248y498cb970r97a14c582fd663e1@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1948
Lines: 41

On 8/16/06, Anonymous User <anonymouslinuxuser@gmail.com> wrote:
> I work for a company that will be developing an embedded Linux based
> consumer electronic device.
>
> I believe that new kernel modules will be written to support I/O
> peripherals and perhaps other things.  I don't know the details right
> now.  What I am trying to do is get an idea of what requirements there
> are to make the source code available under the GPL.
>
> I suspect the company will try to get away with releasing as little as
> possible.  I don't know much about the GPL or Linux kernel internals,
> but I want to encourage the company I work for to give back to the
> community.
>
> I understand that modifications to GPL code must be released under the
> GPL.  So if they tweak a scheduler implementation, this must be
> released.  What if a new driver is written to support a custom piece
> of hardware?  Yes, the driver was written to work with the Linux
> kernel, but it isn't based off any existing piece of code.
>
> I'm posting anonymously because the company probably wouldn't want me
> discussing this at all  :(


Thanks to everyone who has responded to my question so far.

It seems like the two issues that need to be addressed are:
1) Are the kernel modules being developed derived works?  If they are,
they must be released along with the entire kernel source.
2) If they are not derived works, and shipped in a product, does the
fact that they are shipped in a product that uses the linux kernel
require that the new modules be licensed under the GPL?

Yes, I agree that the company I work for should talk to a lawyer.  I
however, am not interested in picking up a big legal tab to satisfy my
curiosity.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/