Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 12:29:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 12:29:45 -0500 Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:9465 "HELO executor.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 12:29:31 -0500 Message-ID: <3BE18677.556C9CDE@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 17:29:27 +0000 From: Arjan van de Ven Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com Organization: Red Hat, Inc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-4smp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Stress testing 2.4.14-pre6 In-Reply-To: <3BE18402.9F958EDC@mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Anyway, I seriously doubt this explains any real-world bad behaviour: the > > window for the interrupt hitting a half-way updated list is something like > > two instructions long out of the whole memory freeing path. AND most > > interrupts don't actually do any allocation. > > Network Rx interrupts do.... definitely not as frequent as IDE > interrupts, but not infrequent. Cerberus doesn't use networking in the tested setup iirc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/