Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting
	(core)
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: rohitseth@google.com
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
       Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
       Andrey Savochkin <saw@sw.ru>, devel@openvz.org, hugh@veritas.com,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
In-Reply-To: <1155835003.14617.45.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com>
References: <44E33893.6020700@sw.ru>  <44E33C8A.6030705@sw.ru>
	 <1155754029.9274.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1155755729.22595.101.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com>
	 <1155758369.9274.26.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1155774274.15195.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1155824788.9274.32.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1155835003.14617.45.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:23:21 -0700
Message-Id: <1155835401.9274.64.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 581
Lines: 16

On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 10:16 -0700, Rohit Seth wrote:
> > That said, it sure is simpler to implement, so I'm all for it!
> 
> hmm, not sure why it is simpler.

When you ask the question, "which container owns this page?", you don't
have to look far, nor is it ambiguous in any way.  It is very strict,
and very straightforward.

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/